I have been thinking that if Prince Charles is just an ordinary man, will the 19-year-old Diana marry him knowing that he loves him? In Diana’s public video, she once said that on the wedding day: “My heart is as calm as death. I feel like a lamb to be slaughtered.”
She could not have been so pitiful. No one sent her to the board. She was willing to do it herself. If she refused, she would force her to stand in the church and say to a man, "I am willing." But can you blame her? Diana can't tell the difference between loving the man or loving the crown, but she actually has many opportunities. But when their marriage name actually exists, she can choose to divorce, but she refuses to do so. Stubbornly retains the title of Wang Hao. Maybe she thought she had paid too much for this title, so she could not lose this honor.
Do not blame the woman's attitude toward love. Apart from the seven fairies, few women will fall in love with Dong Yong, who is a slave. But for ordinary women, we expect to get added value from love. Women often say to themselves that doing better than marrying, of course, it is best to marry a man who is good and loves himself, but the world will not There are so cheap things. Beauty is not like Diana, not to mention other people? To make it clear to a woman at the beginning, it is difficult to love someone or to love the life that a person provides. Often listening to women talking about what kinds of men can marry and marry, they often say with a mouthful that men who are unsuccessful and have no financial ability cannot marry. They lack the grace and heart of the rich. In fact, women do not like this. In reality, there are several women who can say to fame and fortune: "No big deal!"
When young and young are ignorant, why do women who do not know rich families often sneak in love: especially feudal society. Once it is found, it will be the death penalty for Shen Tang, but why do women risk their lives to do such things?
Whether there is pure love in the world, what makes Romeo and Juliet go hand in hand? What made the Duke of Windsor give up the country and the throne? Is it really they are childish or impulsive? I believe it is not: Love is an irreplaceable affection. Apart from being with someone you love, you cannot feel the happiness of love. But the added value of love can be replaced: if you want to be able to get wealth through love, then when you get wealth you don't think you need to be with a wealth provider, especially when you grow up and build With your own wealth kingdom, you can no longer tolerate the man who originally provided you with wealth.
There are many things worth pursuing in the world, but only in love is it really necessary to love each other before you can taste it: Perhaps it is all bittersweet, but there are many other ways to get it, not necessarily. It is only through marrying one person. Why is it that people set a high threshold for their own love? I am concerned that you are not asking too much for love, but that I am worried that you are entering the threshold of people who are precisely those who have nothing to do with love: because true love does not require a threshold; love is a pleasure, a wishful thinking, and Instead of picking tomatoes in the free market, we have to find the most reasonable price/performance ratio.
One of the most loved ones between lovers is probably what you love me. No one has ever said I love your wealth, I love your family business, love what you can provide to me, and why? Because we all know the great scenery. So far, I heard the most touching answer in English: I love you not because who you are, but because of the love when I love with you.
The love that love gives is the most touching. Do you love the love you love?
There is no right or wrong in the world of love, only love and not love.
