I see so Many who think that Others should be there to protect Them. Police, armies, gangs, whatever. SomeOne else should be watching out for Them.
So Many think that robbing Us of Our right to bear arms, giving only “authorities” that right, will protect Them from Any who might attack Them. This is, of course, absurd. When a thug, who does not care if “authority” says arming Oneself is “forbidden” and has a gun, jumps You, if You have something to fend Them off with, You are far more likely to see no damage to Self than if You have nothing.
The “authorities” can only come in after the fact and hope They can find and deliver justice to the thug. And with luck, You survived.
In fact, Our right to carry protection stems from the fact that We cannot expect “authorities” to be there for “protection” of Our crowndom (Self and possessions). Without that right, We are at the mercy of both the thugs and the “authorities.”
And the “authorities” are more likely to be the thugs than Individuals. How many times have You been assaulted by an Individual trying to rob You compared to how many times You have been stopped by a “cop?” Extorted to pay tickets or be forced into a prison?
Indeed, there is no such thing as “authority.” If I have no right to stop You and give You a ticket which You must pay or I can take You off to the hoosegow, You and everyOne else have no right to do that either. But We all have the right – nay, the duty – to arrest Any who have or are breaking the only Laws.
Or call for help in arresting someOne who has broken those Laws.
The only Laws are the three Laws, ancient beyond reckoning, now called the three Laws of Ethics. As I point out often, the legal system is an overlay to the Laws, and filled with legalates They call “laws” to get Us to think We must obey. (Designed to give the system the power to break the Laws against all who consent to the system.)
It is a sign of a very weak One that needs Others to protect Them. Granted, We have children We must protect, and We have elderly and disabled who need protection, and We cannot logically claim They are responsible for protecting Themselves.
But as for the rest of Us…
Yeah, We can protect Ourselves, and surely all the better with weaponry. Thus comes Our foundational right to bear arms. We can protect the weak, as well.
The moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money) have encouraged fear of guns and knives and baseball bats – wouldn’t want to learn to use anything to protect Ourselves! It’s all too scary! And thus They convince Us that We need to ensure no One can protect Themselves.
The moneyed psychopaths can then do things like confiscate guns, and mass murder the populations that think the confiscation is for Their protection – this has happened numerous times in history. The Ones who gave up Their personal protection devices to the “authorities” are defenseless, as the “authorities” mowed Them down.
They, those moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money), have convinced Us that We need Them. We need “authorities.” We are “patriotic” if We support a system of “authority.”
In truth, given no One can give “authority” that They don’t have over Me to someOne else, there can be no legitimate authority. And if there is no authority, any “authority” is there to screw Me, no matter how deep the veneer of “protection” is. Beneath the illusion are People who want to control Me.
So I do not consent to the whole psychopathic legal/governmental system, and will carry what I choose to protect Myself. As long as I am doing nothing unEthical (breaking any of the three Laws), I both expect and demand to be left alone.
And You? Will You make a stand for Your freedom, Your rights? Or will You be Their tool to oppress Humanity? Have They ingrained such fear into You such that You cannot stand? Or can You choose to abandon fear (as I have) and help protect Humanity from “authority?”
Will You protect Yourself? You have a choice.
Calling a Legalate a Law (article): @amaterasusolar/calling-a-legalate-a-law
Self-Defense and Ethics – How Does That Work? (article): @amaterasusolar/self-defense-and-ethics-how-does-that-work
What Do You Know About Ethics? (article): @amaterasusolar/what-do-you-know-about-ethics
The Laws of Ethics Stand Higher Than the Legal System (article): @amaterasusolar/the-laws-of-ethics-stand-higher-than-the-legal-system
Nobility is Measured in Ethics, not Lineage or Money (article): @amaterasusolar/nobility-is-measured-in-ethics-not-lineage-or-money
Morality and Ethics: The Difference (article): @amaterasusolar/morality-and-ethics-the-difference
Just Stop Consenting! (article): @amaterasusolar/just-stop-consenting
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.
