The three Laws of Ethics – originally called “The Three Laws” but searches would not bring them up – are Laws that have been with Humanity since time immemorial. They cover the things that not One of Us would say are okay to do to Us.
No One would say it’s okay for anOther to hurt or kill Them without Their fully informed consent. No One would say it’s just fine for anOther to take or damage Their property without fully informed consent. No One would say it’s marvelous if someOne defrauded Them – lied to Them, cheated Them, duped Them, etc.
One cannot defraud anOther unless it’s without fully informed consent.
These Laws define the only things We all would say are not okay to do to Us. All else is a matter of taste.
The Laws define Natural Law. They are the things that Natural Law proscribes. Doing no harm is covered by these Laws. Natural Law expressed by the three things not to do. These Laws are the foundation of Common Law. Though other things are added onto Common Law, still, it all surrounds these basic Laws. The legal system, however…
In the legal system, with all its legalates that remain on the books unless specifically removed/superseded, called “laws” to make Us think We must obey, there are many unEthical things. As My favorite example, They will arrest You if You collect rain water in some places. And now it’s legal to arrest the homeless! Nothing unEthical about being homeless.
The legal system was devised long ago as an overlay to the Laws, aiming to control commerce. They say it is the “law of the sea,” and the sea was/is all about commerce. They needed something with wiggle room, and have convinced Us all that We must obey the legalates – all the “laws” that are not Laws in that system, that, over time, has become more and more unEthical, giving the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money) power over All who consent to that mess.
And it is founded on consent. The only Laws that are not are the Laws of Ethics.
We all are subject to the three Laws, and We all are responsible for arresting – or calling for help in arresting – Any who are breaking, or have broken the Laws. We do not need to consent to the psychopaths’ system, the legal/governmafia mess that aims to tie Us down, extracting Our energy (represented in “money”) from Us to Their profit.
We can stand sovereign, dealing with Their system under duress only. We can stand on Ethical ground, under the three Laws of Ethics only.
And though They may bully Us when there are Few who are standing, when enough of Us choose to stand against the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money), We will win. And if that is not worth choosing for You, You are part of the problem here. Because… You are not part of the solution.
When We also get free energy tech out in the open, We will win hands down, because that will obsolete the single tool They have to pay bullies with. It makes the accounting for the energy/work/labor We add into a system pointless. And…
It effectively returned Our wealth to Us.
Yes, They hold Our wealth in “trusts” with Them as “trustees.” The moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money) long ago began gathering what is Ours – unEthically – and claimed the “right,” legally of course, to control what is Ours. Claiming We were “incompetent,” and when We did not claim the “trust” fund in a small window of time after reaching majority, They call Us “dead.”
And They can do anything to corpses with no restrictions. Very unEthical, very psychopathic. But money and consent to Their system leads Us to slaughter.
Will You stand sovereign in aggregate with Others doing so? Will You support Ethics over the psychopaths’ legal hell? Will You share awareness that We can stand sovereign and not accept any of that legal/governmafia mess?
Do You have motive to be part of the solution?
Choose wisely.
Ethical Anarchy (article): @amaterasusolar/ethical-anarchy
Trusts: The Big Heist Against Humanity (article): @amaterasusolar/trusts-the-big-heist-against-humanity
Arresting the Homeless (article): @amaterasusolar/arresting-the-homeless
Why Money is Not in Your Best Interest (article): @amaterasusolar/why-money-is-not-in-your-best-interest
You Are a Multimillionaire (article): @amaterasusolar/you-are-a-multimillionaire
Sovereignty is a Hard Sell (article): @amaterasusolar/sovereignty-is-a-hard-sell
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.
