Here’s another video script brought to print with embellishments:
If You go to any dictionary, You will be told that “moral” means “ethical.” And Many use it in that sense. I propose, however, that, though the controllers of the dictionaries have conflated the two terms, in actuality, they are different. Morality comes from culture. In some cultures it’s moral to stone a woman to death for wearing a bikini in public. In other cultures… Not so much. However, it is never Ethical.
The first Law of Ethics is: Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther. Clearly, in societies that deem it “moral” to stone People, They work against Ethics. It is never Ethical to stone anOther. From this We see that morals are subjective, while Ethics are objective.
The second Law of Ethics is: Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone. From this, We can grasp that “governments” are thieves, as shown with “eminent domain” and “taxes,” both of which apply force to take what belongs to Others. If You don’t have an Ethical right to take from Others, how can You support Others, claiming “authority” is behind Them doing so?
I don’t have the right to say to You that You owe Me taxes, or Your property, without You having consented to the deal, having been fully informed. How can I give anyOne else that right? How can You vote for someOne and then say They have the right to forcefully take what’s Mine? “Authority” is an illusion created by psychopaths.
The third Law of Ethics is: Do not defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent).
We can grasp that “media” are defrauding Us as They cover manufactured “events” and give them to Us as “reality.” When “mass shootings” are in season (yes, the “news” follows a seasonal presentation), We are told of sandy hooks that snag Us by Our emotions. You may think these “events” are real, asking why the “media” would lie, but when You consider the idea that “authority” might want Us disarmed…
The purpose of defrauding Us becomes starkly clear.
When You add in the fact that “governments” are corporations owned by Ones who aim to control Us all, controlling Us physically, emotionally, mentally, and spiritually, disarming Us will make it all the easier to take control of Us physically. A path They have been on for at least a century and a half – and likely much longer.
Indoctrinating Us in “education” controls Our minds, telling lies of viruses and contagion – neither of which have ever been proven – which profits Them as They sell pHARMaceuticals as jabs and pills, and offers the ability to create fear in Us and thereby control Us through Their “media.” Many other things are taught as “truth” to manipulate Us, as well.
“Human-created climate change” is used to suggest that nature (cow farts) is a problem for the planet and that We would best deprive Ourselves of diets Humanity thrived on for aeons, and go for things clearly not good for Us – if bugs were good for food, the planet would be eating them as the staple.
History has been mucked with in many way, no doubt.
Aiming stories in the “news” at Our emotions and not Our logic controls Us by fear. And with all that… Our spirits are bound to Their will.
Surely, You might argue, no One in (the corporation called) Our government is so motivated to control Us! We are the land of the free! But when You grasp that money will promote psychopaths to power, They being the Ones who will do literally anything to get the power money provides, that well over half Our planet’s wealth is “owned” by fewer than 100 People here, that They can buy all major corporations, governments and their agencies, schools, media, medical, pharmaceutical, research, technology, “law” enFORCEment, textbook production, dictionaries and encyclopedias…
Food production, water providers, communications, “justice,” “law” firms, military, black projects, and on and on…
The agenda to control Us becomes stark.
If We “rise up,” They will put Us down, calling Us beasts and not gentleOnes. They will see “justification.” So… What is a solution? How can We stand free without violence? Without controversy? As gentleOnes? As civilized Beings? As Ethical Ones?
For single Individuals, engaging Their system to become Secured Party/Creditors is a fair amount of a solution – for Individuals who can afford it, or know the details of the legal ropes. But the better path, and one that costs no money, will be a solution in aggregate. We make Individual choices that create the aggregate result. For Human society here on Our planet, when enough of Us withdraw Our consent from the systems They (the psychopaths) control and choose to consent to better, a way of doing things such that We All are Our own authority, upholding the Laws of Ethics…
We will be on Our way – We would best do things personally so that aggregately We win.
And when We add free energy technologies to the mix the use of money will dissipate. Without the need for money to live richly (see I Have a Blueprint and Blueprint for a Society of Ethical Sovereigns, linked below), no psychopaths are promoted to own Us (or think They do – “legally”). We will solve for virtually every problem We see today. Including poverty, bribery, “authority,” and more! Including unEthical things on wide scales.
What can You do today? Withdraw consent – see The GentleOne’s Solution, linked below, for how. Share awareness that We do not have to consent – that We never consented Ethically (fully informed and with Our recorded consent).
See the rest of the links below for more, including one I found that explains how the psychopaths think They own Us. And more on withdrawing consent while not creating controversy.
When a few of Us do this, there will be resistance. When many of Us do this, They will be overwhelmed. We can create vastly better than what They are creating for Us Now.
Morality and Ethics (8 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/morality-and-ethics:e?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72
This is how They made us stocks to buy and sell (12 minutes): https://odysee.com/@OurFreeSociety:2/For-Americans-who-are-not-FREE-This-is-how-They-made-us-stocks-to-buy-and-sell:1
The GentleOne’s Solution (article): @amaterasusolar/the-gentleones-solution
I Have a Blueprint (article): @amaterasusolar/i-have-a-blueprint-siwbd7
Blueprint for a Society of Ethical Sovereigns (article): @amaterasusolar/blueprint-for-a-society-of-ethical-sovereigns
Just Stop Consenting! (article): @amaterasusolar/just-stop-consenting
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.
