The word “tolerance” embodies profound humanity and high moral value. It suggests respect for others, as well as for different ways of thinking, or acceptance of others’ mistakes or shortcomings.
But what does tolerance truly mean? Is it really such a profoundly Christian word?
Does it mean that everyone can, in fact, do whatever evil they please—or whatever good they wish—without anything prompting us to take action or adopt a certain attitude? Or does it mean that none of those actions concern us at all?
Does tolerance mean that we must refuse to intervene when an individual or a group engages in behavior that threatens life, liberty, the rights of men or women, or the dignity and rights of others?
Does tolerance mean we should remain indifferent when someone engages in such behaviors—some of which are even risky to themselves or those around them—simply because the person committing them is “an adult,” and as such, it’s none of our business?
When faced with someone who is stubbornly in the wrong, who destroys their own life or the lives of others, should we stand idly by? How far do freedom and tolerance extend, and where do they end—and at what point must we take into account our responsibility toward others or toward society?
Isn’t the concept of tolerance also an excuse for the indifference that plagues contemporary societies? A true and stark abdication of our own responsibilities, and a toxic form of self-indulgence?
Image by Kathleen Bergmann from Pixabay
Original text written by 