Hi, this is Val Campbell and I'm an author and I write novels about a mercenary team of assassins that deal with bad guys permanently. And I have published nine novels and I write and create these scenes, these missions that this team goes on. And I do that with a lot of detail.
I spent a lot of time researching and figuring out how these things would work and what the shot angles and the ballistics and the logistics and all of this stuff, right? And I don't know who killed Charlie Kirk because when I started looking at this, none of it makes sense. Now, I'm not the world's greatest expert on all of these individual pieces. But the people that are can't seem to come to any kind of conclusion.
They don't agree. Now, how is that? How is it that you could take a half a dozen, I mean really, really experts and they all come up with pretty much dramatically different opinions on what actually happened here because the evidence is so bizarre. So, why am I making this video? First off, as Gary Melton, who you'll see a link to below, as he said, we're tired of all of the misdirection and the BS and the lack of information and the covering our eyes so we can't really see the truth. We need numbers.
We need to stand up, demand, and put pressure. Secondly, I believe that there are people out here that are my friends that don't have time to spend the many hours that I did reviewing all of this stuff and they may not have the background to analyze the shot perspectives and geometry and the logistics and the ballistics and the anatomy and all of that stuff. And it's important that we all, I believe that we all have some level of understanding of what the issues are in this case. Why? Because they keep putting these narratives forward because Charlie Kirk was an important person.
He was a very, very important person and somebody killed him. Now, was it this 22-year-old Twinkie who managed to clamber up on a rooftop and get off a miracle shot and somehow with a .300-six did what a .300-six can't do? This is weird. So, what happened was I was working on a project on a video project about how we as humans aren't protecting ourselves from predators.
And my buddy calls me and says, 'Hey, did you hear on the news just now Charlie Kirk was assassinated?' and it was just like somebody let the air out of me. It's like, no. Because Charlie Kirk was a good guy and he was really smart and he was really fair. I don't care who you are, what you think or don't think. This is a guy who went into the public forum and debated. He put it out there. He was honest with his beliefs. He put them out there and he attracted millions of followers. This was an important person in our nation and somebody killed him and we need to speak up. Something's going on here. I don't know what, but something. So, let's talk about some of the bullet points.
Sorry, I shouldn't have used that term. I didn't mean to really. Let's talk about some of the individual points of this case and what just seemed off to me. First, my buddy calls and he says, "Man, I just saw videos out and there was blood all over the place and you know, it looked like maybe the a bullet came and glanced up off of his body armor." And my first thought was, "Huh, that that sounds weird." The next thing was you couldn't really avoid the images coming out.
I saw something come across my social media feeds with this scene and I thought, who put this guy in a fishbowl? Obviously, he'd had threats. We all knew that. And he's in an amphitheater down low with buildings all around him. And nobody secured these roofs. This crowd was just chaos. This was his style. But where's his security team?
These people are either stupid or complicit.
Stupid or guilty. You make your pick. And I'm not saying that there's a conspiracy. I'm saying something doesn't match here. This doesn't make any sense. You supposedly hire a security team and they don't secure again after what we've experienced for the last six or eight, nine months. Again, rooftops open, no security, no drones. The next thing that seemed bizarre to me was the shot scene, the actual situation. There's no exit wound. There's no evidence of impact.
I'm sorry. This little thing on the neck, that is not an entrance wound. It looks more like an exit wound, although it's not a big enough exit wound to make any kind of sense at all.
I don't get it. I haven't heard a plausible explanation for this yet. With all respect to Gary Melton, who I loved his work, the analysis he did on this, but I'm going to explain to you what my contradiction is with this. And I'm not saying he's wrong. I'm saying I don't understand. So, somebody please answer my questions. So, you see these videos of what happens to him when he gets shot and his body movement. And I'm going to explain the problem I have with this. A .306 is probably a 150 to 175 grain bullet traveling 2500 feet per second delivering 2300 foot-pounds of force.
To be comtinued