Crypto, the Mystery Behind the Ratings

Words
292
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
7y

Alt Text

I have to confess, after realizing that Crypto has an IMDB rating of 6, I was kind of happy. But after watching the movie, I was shocked.

I mean, completely blown away.

Immediately I went to Rotten Tomatoes, and it all became clear. You see, the tomatometer was 20% while the fan reviews were bordering the 80%.

As you might expect, this kind of discrepancy between critics and audiences is not something that you see everyday. Although it's not truly abnormal.

So I went back to that IMDB page to see if the comment section really reflect the votes that gave that movie their 6 star rating.

At the first page, these are the ratings the commentators gave (out of 10): 1, 2, 0, 3, 1, 2, 6, 0, 4, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 2, 4, 2, 1, 1, 0, 2.

The comments were pretty telling as well:

“What the hell!”

“Auto-generated screenplays must be a thing now”

“Misleading Title.
This movie has very little to do with crypto. more of a family drama with very poor execution in all departments.”

“Not sure who this movie is for”

“Bad casting, bad acting, bad editing. omg, the lead is supposed to be a super sleuth but he looks like a boxer!”

And the most generous comment, the only one over 5 (rated 6) is this one:

“Three writers, and you'd think at least one would get it right”.

Alt Text

Personally, I agree with the first comment on IMDB: "What the Hell?" But I want to know your thoughts about it.

Stayed tuned for a detailed review on the next post, but meanwhile I leave you with a question: What did you think of the movie?

Image Sources: 1 - 2 - 3

Crypto, the Mystery Behind the Ratings | Ecency