~ The next little ice age Vol. 66 ~

Skepticism during the "Global Warming Era".

The climatic models aren't fulfilled but the lie continues ..

Image Source meereisportal.de

As we can see in the graph of the upper part, the ice accumulated in the Arctic platform isn’t disappearing. The amount of ice accumulated on the Arctic shelf is more than ten million square kilometers, exceeding in almost one million square kilometers to the fourth country with more extension (USA).
Not only that, but the data that is being recorded is better than last year.

Image Source meereisportal.de

With the data collected by the Bremen University we can see as if we compare yesterday's measurements with the same day of last year we see how the amount of accumulated ice has increased by at least two hundred thousand square kilometers. We can also observe in this graph that the red line that represents this year is very close to the gray shaded area that represents the first historical series 1981-2010. Something completely impossible if the predictions of Al Gore were correct.

The predictions of the famous and in my opinion shameful Nobel Prize Al Gore are not being fulfilled.

I have to say thank God they are not being fulfilled. Because the predictions made in the famous documentary of the year 2006 spoke of the total thaw of the polar regions for this years, which would be catastrophic for the species that inhabit the polar regions. In addition to having a great impact for the climate of our planet.

As you can see in the two previous images this isn’t close to happen.

Even so, the mass media of the world have continued with the nonsense. Shamefully using alarmist predictions and away from reality.

Only the brave…

Very few scientists have been critical of the predictions made in the first years of this millennium. This is a very thorny issue that moves a huge amount of money.

One of the scientists who have dared to criticize all this alarmism is Bjørn Lomborg. With his book "The skeptical ecologist" published in 2003 received criticism from all scientific publications. Although over the years has been shown much closer to reality than most predictions made by the NCA.

Bjorn Lomborg argues that many of the elaborate and expensive actions now being considered to stop global warming will cost hundreds of billions of dollars, are often based on emotional rather than strictly scientific assumptions, and may very well have little impact on the world's temperature for hundreds of years.
”Cool it” the book

For a better understanding of the climate, I strongly recommend reading Lomborg's books. You can also watch the documentary based on the book “Cool it”.

Another brave is Patrick J. Michaels who has dared to compare predictions with reality.
We can read an article on his blog entitled:“What You Won’t Find in the New National Climate Assessment”.

Image Source cato.org

”The projections in the NCA are all based upon climate models. If there is something big that is systematically wrong with them, then the projections aren’t worth making or believing.”
Patrick J. Michaels director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute.

What "Pat Michaels" tells us in this article of his blog is basically the difference between alarmism and reality.

One of the things that bothers me the most about "global warming" is that it tries to load the responsibility on the shoulders of each of the inhabitants of the Earth. But neither you nor I ever chose the global energy model.