Criticism of WT? Come on!
We must determine from the first seconds when the channel bears criticism. Either it will be constructive dialogue, or destructive chatter. The conversation was aimed only at stealing your time.
First of all, it is necessary to answer the first question:
Why were we criticized?
The designation of the conditions underlying this is not always a partial service. Here, let's say, you yourself. The natural question is what to do in this case. That's right, nothing. The initiative here is not on the side of the initiator. Except when the critic comes to the place and does not overshadow the fears of worthy praise.
Who is a critic?
This is even simpler. Either this is a person who specializes in a particular topic and his opinion (and this should be seen as a warning about mistakes in the future by a more experienced specialist), or it's Aunt Frosya who sits on a bench in front of cats her favorite cat and a clearly oriented civic position for all young people girls and youth.
What is the importance of the personalities of third parties for you personally?
You surrendered with the masterpiece of the film on your mobile phone, fed homeless pigeons, refused to take a seat in the elevator for the benefit of another passenger, went to shit, your "Zapta" more than your partner, made presentations for foreign colleagues, etc. and so on etc. WHAT IS THIS REALLY WILL BE NEEDED IN ANOTHER OPINION WITH SOME CRITICISM?
This is something that you do not need to do, so it's against criticism!
And it does not matter, you yourself asked for such a masochistic procedure or unexpectedly attacked a passing pedestrian with a bad mood. In both, though controversial cases, you must wait until the end of the speech of the critical party and either bring your arguments in defense of your interests, or ignore criticism and continue your hard work.
P.S .: The topic is not one-time, and if you enter details, then after the 48th paragraph you will already be far from this post)))
