http://upfront.com.au/pages/artists/roving-performers/john-lane.php
It was a sign of the man's ability to focus and think deeply, and it is an indication that this man is not immune to the most difficult problems that And that he can control all the things he faces thanks to his wisdom and the ingenuity of his tongue, which is a fatal blow to the person who challenges you in a situation, and it ends a discussion you do not want to complete, as the art of reply means silencing the testicles before you, Convince him argument and proof, so that he can not say Shi A later. People used this talent to participate in the science of debate, a challenge between two so that one can not keep pace with the other, and the basic condition is that both parties use strong and persuasive responses. The audience will listen to such a debate, It was held at the highest levels, and was held in all areas, whether literary or scientific, in addition to it was attended by some of the best men who have such a feature and talent. And the books of history have borne us the best examples of such positions, such that Napoleon Bonaparte was asked days, that the cook is much better than the writer and poet, as the cook cooks the food we enjoy more than the enjoyment we find in the words of poetry and literature, Dogs also think so, so the man was silent but did not speak a word after that. For this reason, the speed of reason in reply was an art, and it is also still an art that everybody wants to be professional. It enriches the person for many things that he does not want. It also enriches many dialogues that do not benefit them. To be provided with a little honesty and honesty, and that the ethics of the human speaker is high, does not injure a person in his words in order to silence him, as does not infringe on anyone in the way he spoke, in order not to create bickering. The self-defense of speech is much better than the self-defense through beatings and quarrels. The other type is a comical observation of Tarif's position. It happens spontaneously in front of him, and we see this a lot on television and in news programs. Two people with different opinions are hosted, talking and each person responds to the other in a subtle way, but while preserving the idea of the other person, Correct.
follow me 
