Salute to women who are still idealistic, namely in terms of maintaining their "virginity" before marriage, as long as they don't discredit other women who are not virgins. For me, glorifying virginity and then despising women who were not virgins before marriage with the words "Used", "Cheap" and the like is an indication that someone is trapped in an old-fashioned dogma that is completely false. Why is that? Because virginity is a myth, virginity is a biological phenomenon, not a moral one.
It must be understood that the tearing of the hymen does not only occur due to sexual activity, it can be due to an accident. The thickness and sensitivity of the hymen in each woman are different, as far as I know. And, even if the hymen is torn before marriage, it does not reduce a person's value as a woman who has the right to be treated equally. And if a woman "lost her virginity" before being married to her lover, is it necessary to question the role of the man? Why does it seem as if morality is only tendentious and loose for men? Is it true that we are still hegemonic by a patriarchal way of thinking?
In this case, we can be one voice or not, for me, the rejection of non-virginity based on dogma and morals will only prolong the stigma about women's vaginas. The virginity or non-virginity of women does not affect the quality of women at all, the way they behave toward you and the traumatic "forced" by the psychological mob with ridicule, ridicule, and insults affect their quality as women.
Again, you may agree and you may not. Cheers 馃嵒馃嵒
