The Preference For Solitude Rather Than Human Interaction; Are We Misunderstanding This Perception?
Image source
As much as we need interaction in the human society a lot of it can be Infringing just like unchecked freedom of speech can be really problematic the reason is because sometimes we thrive in solitude better than we do thrive where there is laughter, cackling, drinking and other sort of things of Interaction that really isn't beneficial to the state of mind. I've been in a particular situation where i was surrounded by extended families, uncles, great uncles and great aunts and they took their turn to prod questions at me about family histories and when I couldn't provide it, they took their turn to laugh at my naivety. The truth was I knew the answer to the question they were trying to ask me but I couldn't process any thought and I was affected by their chatter and anytime I tried to think properly I hit a wall of bluntness. We often misquote or misunderstand the onus to human interaction and this counters it too many cook spoils the broth have you ever wondered why it's mandatory for an exam hall to be quiet and devoid of noise? It's because there needs to be a privacy for the brain to show a particular fuctionality.
That said freedom to assimilate, process and divulge should come with a lonesome attribute and that's where we thrive the best. We are often finding ourselves more quiet or silent in places where we hardly know people and this allows us to observe a few things which are a lit bit invincible unless close observation is put in check. That said we're often more active when we're in a state of inaction and we're often distracted to the state of our environment when we're indulgent in many activities, this might seem ironic but when our personal space is infringed upon there is an inability to create, to perceive to assimilate and to perform sound cognitive actions. This is often why people who are grieved often wants to be alone because a whole lot of questions pertaining to how their loved one was deceased often awaken thoughts upon thoughts and this rather disturbs rather then heal or brings closure.
Without a doubt, we're paradoxical in our existence, laid out like plain sheet but we're enigmatic as much as ephemeral or round to how we hold notions, ideas and perceptions. Interaction which seems baseless and bogus hardly helps mental development sometimes there are hindrance and blockade which are psychologically present and when often don't recognise or understand how it works or seems because we often aren't of the clear mind when we're exposed to a whole lot process that should be cut off from our clear reasoning. In times people criticise us for wanting space not understanding what the space is meant for. There is often a concluded percept held by these people and it often ends up misplaced and sometimes it builds up bad blood.
In conclusion bogus interaction between people is an excess we need to cut of to increase our brain activities channeled into the right proportion. Less talking more thinking more space, the more intuition to be productive, more crowd the lesser tendency to have freer chance to perform tasks that a human is designated for, but all this are considered as rudeness, cynicism and maladjustment if the highest order. In a clearer perspective we don't know people until we give them the space to be themselves that's why confidence is self built and not artificially given. In essence people needs to understand this aspect to them if not we'll keep faulting people for simply wanting to do what they seem fit for their mental creativeness as well as productivity. That said over indulgence in interactiveness makes for lack of privacy and this leads to a whole lot of exposure.
.