Only Murders in the Building 207: Flipping The Pieces

2022-08-01 - Monday - 03:41 AM - 03:30 AM - - Only Murders in the Building 207: Flipping The Pieces

---

Solving puzzles. Dad. Cancer. Died. She locked memories out. She is not the killer. Glitter man. Power goes out. Big cliff hanger.

---

10:57 AM
Mason Turner - InfoWars & Alex Jones SH Trial August, 2 2022 Day 6 LIVE

11:00 AM
Law & Crime Network - Infowars Host Owen Shroyer Testifies In Alex Jones's Defamation Trial

At one point, the DA played a segment of the Sunday show from like 2017 where Owen Shroyer asked questions, mentioned a story from Zerp Hedge, and played a few videos. One video of a Sandy Hook father who said he held his son in his hands right after his death. The next video was of a doctor that said parents did not see their dead kids right away. Third video was of a mother who said she did not see her dead kid right away. So, how would the father see his son but the mother would not see her kid? The doctor said parents did not. The father contradicted the doctor.

---

The DA went on to say Infowars is an infomercial. He said the mother was able to see her kid but chose not. However, the DA failed to have timestamps which would give proper context. The DA said if you say the word claim that you think it may not be true. But claim is a word that deals with the scientific method. The DA is like oh you think he is lying or tellign the truth? Neither.

---

The DA in glasses says the apology Alex Jones gave was fake. But that question is not relevant. But the DA assumes Alex bad.

---

Woojer.

---

Virtual real estate.

---

Playing only part of a video clip is the same as quoting a person. The DA attacked the video clips by saying it was not the full video. But in life, nothing is ever full be it video or life itself.

---

The DA said Alex Jones can only get out his Sandy Hook lies through Infowars but Alex got his word out via Joe Rogan and Tim Pool and a number of people. The DA lied.

---

Wavgrind.com
3K+ music samples.

06:35 PM
Law & Crime Network - Alex Jones Testifies in the Sandy Hook Defamation Trial (Part One)

Two minutes into the video and the judge literally says people message her with information about what Alex Jones as it relates to this Sandy Hook trial and yet the judge has the balls to say she does not care and will not investigate. A little while ago, the DA attacked Owen Shroyer for not investigating.

---

Tony Robbins
Timetothrivechallenge.com

---

Givethisashot.com

---

Alex Jones was influenced:
Frog man.
Larry King.
Howard Stern.
Johnny Carson.

---

Alex started syndicated himself as early as 1997. The Infowars website started in 1997 and the Infowars company started that year or at least by 1999 at the latest. Alex started making documentaries as early as 1997 at the latest. Not sure if he had any before that or not. Alex said he started doing his own show as early as like 1994.

---

The judge didn't want the juror to know why Alex Jones has a raspy voice. 44:30 - Alex Jones was able to slip in an answer the judge stopped him from answering earlier, that Alex Jones tore his throat up from talking and yelling these past three to four decades. Alex slipped the info in while drinking water.

---

Doodly.com

---

53:00 minutes in, the reason why we need independence media.

---

54:40 minutes in Alex Jones gave an analogy of two dogs killing each other in a dog fight. A real fight. Real death. But synthetic, staged, or fake, means people throw the dogs in. Same thing with events which can be real and yet weaponized, etc.

---

59:20 minutes in Alex Jones again says sorry my coughing is not Covid, just a torn up throat. 1:02:00 minutes in, over ten million emails were submitted to discovery, to the court. Yet judges will say Infowars didn't turn in everything and yet Infowars did.

---

08:03 PM
1:06:00 minutes in, the orange head man said Infowars is not bankrupt and did not cooperate with discovery. But Infowars did file bankruptcy. It may be a bit technical because there are different forms and types of bankruptcy and filing. So, orange man might say it was not type A and yet will fail to say it was in fact type B or type C or whatever it was. Orange man is being deceptive. Same thing with discovery. Infowars turned over all the emails and more. We all know this and yet orange man continues to lie.

---

08:12 PM
1:10:50 minutes in, the judge is telling Alex Jones that Alex cannot talk about how Infowars did file bankruptcy and yet other people could tell the jurors lies about the financial details. The judge said the financial was not to be discussed and yet it was discussed. Alex said to her that it was discussed and thought he could do it because other people did it. The rules was NOBODY could do it. But the judge then said JUST KIDDING. The judge said they can do it but ALEX JONES CANNOT DO IT. That is insane. The judge is breaking laws and is being criminal.

---

1:12:10 minutes in, the orange man says to the judge that everything Alex Jones says has to be taken like you would a documentary. As in it had to be fact or if not then Alex must be imprisoned and fined. In other words, not protected speech. Yet, Alex was taken out of context and he would interviewed people who said different things. Plus, other people said a lot on other shows and everywhere before Alex started covering Sandy Hook.

---

08:23 PM
1:14:00 minutes in the judge rants about how Infowars and Alex Jones did not comply to discovery over the years relating to the Sandy Hook trials which is a lie. This judge is so evil and the purpose is to simply continue spreading lies in order to attack independent journalists and what have you. It is not merely about Infowars.

---

1:16:20 minutes in the judge said to Alex Jones that he HAS TO LIE to the jury via not telling the jury Infowars did in fact comply with discovery. INSANE. How can judges do this? WHY is she not disbarred?

---

The people watching this who like the judge will burn in Hell.

---

08:31 PM
The judge contradict herself by saying first that Alex Jones lied but then said that it doesn't matter if Alex thought he was not lying. See, if you're ordered to tell truth, then all you can do is tell your truth. But the judge said your truth is not wanted. She only wants her truth. But in reality, all you can do is tell your truth from your perspective. But the judge said you CANNOT do that. But we have to. Humans are bias. Humans can only talk from personal opinion, paradigms.

---

08:36 PM
1:20:00 minutes in the judge says you can only say what is truthful and a fact. But she failed to say according to who. That is the funny thing about this case in particular. If you presented facts and evidence to this judge, she would say those doctors and scientists are lying. And yet they are not. If you presented real scientific studies to this judge, she would laugh at you and then throw you in prison.

---

Motion. No. Judge cries they are orders. Give me a break.

---

The judge is telling the defense that Infowars is guilty. That is crazy because a trial is suppose to determine IF IF IF IF IF you are guilty or innocent. But she continued to say the jurors cannot know that Alex Jones is innocent and told the jurors they CANNOT know this. She said it to their face. She is scared to death that they might find out that she is lying to them.

---

---

---