02:38 AM
Tim Pool - Timcast IRL - Chinese Military SURROUNDS Taiwan During Pelosi Visit, WW3 Trending w/Angela McArdle

Charitywater.org
Plastic surgery to remodel people with crazy face tumors, etc. The number one cause of death is dirty water. Charity Water make water wells in Africa, looks transparent as a charity.

Riverside.fm

Maggie 108: Your Past Will Inform Your Present

2022-08-03 - Wednesday - 03:34 AM - 04:13 AM - Maggie 108: Your Past Will Inform Your Present

---

NFTs were mentioned. Prom night. School no like black dude as a counselor. Angel. Change name or not. Love still out there.

---

11:55 AM
Law&Crime Network - Alex Jones Defamation Trial: Sandy Hook 'Hoax' Lawsuit - Day Seven

Alex Jones said many callers would mention Sandy Hook in 2012 right after it happened.

The judge didn't want the jurors to know Alex Jones was getting a divorce around 2012 around the time of Sandy Hook.

Steve tricked Alex Jones in saying Sandy Hook looked fake, that nobody died. Alex would say he could see how it could have been perhaps fake. But after 2015, Alex started realizing how people did die. Alex started meeting the parents and would say he was sorry. The fake news would say Alex was still bad man but he was not.

---

12:20 PM
The judge said Alex Jones cannot talk about what Trump said. Around 31:50 minutes in the judge says Alex cannot say anything that he heard or read. Now, that is insane. Where do you draw the line with this mentality of hearsay philosophy that has been henceforth weaponized? That is insane for so many reasons. What else are you left to say because everything we say can be connected to the effects of other people.

---

12:23 PM
Why is that they can show videos but Alex Jones CANNOT mention say even the same video assuming that the video was not in evidence? That is insane. If I quote something that is said in a video, it is not hearsay. It is in the video. There is evidence to it. There are witnesses. But the judge will say that is hearsay as a convenient way to selectively enforce alleged rules as to have a cleaver way to dismiss anything at any time.

---

12:33 PM
37:50 minutes in the judge says what Alex Jones was saying was hearsay and yet it was NOT HEARSAY because it was on television and everywhere. There is evidence, proof, that they did it, that they said it. The judge is wrong. Hearsay is applied to private situations where there are no witnesses. But the entire world is a witness to how fake news attacked Alex on Father's Day of 2017.

---

The judge said TV is hearsay. That is insane and not true.

---

04:06 PM
1:10:00 the attorney asks Alex Jones his views on Sandy Hook and the judge said Alex CANNOT answer that question and then said there was no question. This was after the defense said Alex was very close to contempt which is not true but the judge does whatever the defense says.

---

16 jurors.

---

06:22 PM
3:34:00 minutes in the judge says Alex Jones cannot tell people where he got the idea that the jurors were blue collar if Alex got the info externally from studies, facts, evidence, truth, scientists, experts. That is crazy for the judge to say because humans will generally develop their own thoughts based off other people and things. In other words, everything in life is allegedly hearsay as you might call it. The judge is like you can't talk about it if it came from outside of yourself. But we humans obtain our originality, our opinions, and everything, from those who came before us. Therefore, it would be literally impossible to say anything at all in a court of law during a trial because humans are bias and humans are plagued by hearsay. Everything you do is influenced by hearsay and therefore classified either to be directly or indirectly hearsay.

07:44 PM
Law & Crime Network - Alex Jones Defamation Trial: Sandy Hook 'Hoax' Lawsuit - Day Seven, Part Two

There were 14 jurors like today during questions from them through the judge at Alex. But the judge here said 12 jurors. So two are gone now it seems.

---

07:59 PM
25:00 minutes in the man in glasses is like Alex Jones might be saying nobody died or maybe that oh the government did it and both are painful for the parents to hear, Yeah, the truth hurts. If your house is on fire and I say it is on fire, I might be hurting you. But the house on fire will hurt you more. The truth hurts. If something is not true, then it does not hurt. It does not matter. If murderers did bad, then you get them to pay and not the people who talked about the bad people. You don't shoot the messenger. Alex is just a messenger.

---

08:15 PM
34:00 minutes in the man in glasses accuses Infowars Alex Jones of a continuous decade-long Sandy Hook defamation campaign attack which is absolutely not true as it was not an attack and it was NOT continuous. First off, other news outlets covered Sandy Hook before Infowars did. Second, callers demanded that Alex talk about it. Third, Alex talked to many people on his shows about over the years sometimes but not continuously. Over the years, many different people said many different things on Alex's show but also not on his show. Alex has given his opinions at different times over the years regarding it. But fake news take his words out of context. Alex played Devil's advocate many times and said many things. Long story short, Alex only talked about it less than one percent of the time. Also, many people talked about it on other shows too. Alex didn't start the questioning. Plus, questioning is not bad. Talking and free speech is not bad. Bad people weaponize real events. What happened is a long story. We don't have time right now to talk about all the things that happened as it relates to school shootings, false flags, many events in world history where real people really do die and yet it is also a false flag at the same time in that it is weaponized and stuff. Sometimes you can have crisis actors and you can have real people die. And perhaps some people did not die. Perhaps some people were not actors. Perhaps there were some crisis actors. Perhaps many different things happened at the same time.

---

08:34 PM
49:15 minutes in, glasses man says Infowars covered Sandy Hook for 27 hours in video over the past decade since 2012. He goes on to say it doesn't matter that smaller number is buried within many thousands of hours of other lies and stuff. In other words, he is saying Infowars is just one big lie and that when Infowars predicted Covid back in 2010 and also around 2001 and countless times via the Rockefeller Lock-Step white papers and other documents and things, that all of that is deception and everything even as we can clearly see what Alex says come true. Another example was Alex was talking about Jeffrey Epstein for years.

---

4patriot.com

---

08:45 PM
52:40 minutes he shows a photo for a second without even trying to think about it. That is called being so closed minded as to not being able to analyze data. It was a photo of kids at a Super Bowl in I think 2015. So like three years after Sandy Hook. Now, who were those kids? I would have to investigate deeply for many hours to confirm who those kids were or were not. You should not have the mentality of just laughing things off. I am not saying who those kids at the Super Bowl were or were not and that is the point. You don't know either way and therefore you can't just say one way or another. Like until you prove their exact finger prints and birth certificates and place of birth and schools and DNA and blood and where they lived and who their parents and family and friends were and everything and then cross reference all of that data with that of the kids of Sandy Hook, if you don't scientifically and thoroughly compare both sets of data, then you don't really know either way. Again, I am not saying anything. I am simply saying I don't know and you do not know either, period. And if you think you know without specific evidence to support your claims, then you are doing so outside of the realm of the scientific method.

---

10:20 PM
20 kids and 6 educators died during Sandy Hook or so they say.

---

The defense who was defending Alex Jones gave a good speech to the jury.

---

They said it was bad that Owen Shroyer reported on a story from Zero Hedge and yet they decided not to sue the writer who posted that story. That does not make sense.

---

---

---