I have taken you off the list now that I see you are a real person and your account is not compromised. Your account is one of a sizable group that appeared to have been either identity theft or just a

I appreciate you constantly bringing up different points of view. In the case of ID theft it just happens to be the worst possible type of 'abuse', second only to phishing. The effects of it are so devastating

It's because we have a lot of people who steal other people's identities and destroy their lives, all to make a few bucks off a post under their names. At the end of the day, I can handle the fact that

Yep, I totally understand your reasons; however, I'm still mindful of cases being blacklisted for trying to hide identities through multiple accounts. I mean, you even have a banned category for unverified?

This will be somewhat disjointed and out of order. Thanks for the kind words first of all. That website ... it's the legacy of our previous team. I'll be honest with you, it looks unappealing because I

We get a lot of tags so they're easy to miss. If it's a serious matter like that it needs to be an inquiry on chat or a direct message. I wouldn't have been able to reply with instructions on the chain

There are a major issues with doing everything on chain. Even if a better system was created (let's say a frontend that doesn't nest comments and makes them very readable and only selects the Hivewatchers

Like if someone posts "I'll kill you" and it's a real threat? Hivewatchers as a project doesn't interfere as this is a matter that requires expertise beyond what volunteers can achieve. Hivewatchers

So you're basically asking are witnesses liable for the information stored on their nodes. It's an old question. I personally believe the answer is no. That's the short of it. The long of it is as follows.

Haha it's just that Hivewatchers doesn't deal with copyright at all. That's because we don't deal with legal matters. We don't care what's legal or illegal in some country or jurisdiction. We deal with

Hivewatchers doesn't deal with copyright. What I'm referring to was just myself helping out with queries.

Now that's a blast from the past. Grumpycat. Most of the DMCA questions that I saw were just from content owners who found their stuff on Steemit. They just didn't want someone else taking their work and

Best thing to do is to stop thinking about it. People downvote all the time. But some downvotes may have nothing to do with you in the first place. In some cases they're just there to negate the upvote

I handled a lot of the queries for them back on Steem before pointing them to the proper channels but that was on the old chat and that's gone. There's no public record of these (but let me think if any

You are not on Spaminator and it's not connected to me in any way. I have no idea who you are at all. (Just for the record, there is no trail on Spaminator and never should be. We don't use trails.)

Didn't know they lived in the wild like this.

I just woke up. (but yeah I went over it)

Yes that's still true of course. You don't have to vote for me. I don't reply here because of that but because you tagged me with a question.

I'm not interested in reading Fyrstikken posts about Steem which was run to the ground and destroyed by Ned.

Walden was operating on his own, similarly how SFR and other services work on their own. Since we don't deal with any content outside the scope there isn't much we can do except for ban from our Discord