Did you ever question the fact If Aristotle and Plato dedicated their lives to something they don't really believe? Many years ago and still today humans have to learn their knowledge at the schools. Do you really believe it is meaningless despite the fact we still go so many years back in order to receive the ancient knowledge?
For example, take Karl Marx and his book 'das capital', and you can see that his vision completely is combined with the visions of the ancient philosophers and their knowledge. Their way of thinking is very same, I would say. In the name of capital, it is a part in the whole process of dehumanization. With no shame at all.
Karl Marx comes with the claim that a worker should earn just enough to stay healthy, so that he can produce each day the same. Speaking the truth, the only reason we give you money is to stay working for us. If you earn too much of money you become lazy, just enough is the amount to see you show up each day, with the just right amount of sleep you need for your energy level to produce as much as possible.
Is this a ‘philosophy’ full of ethics and deep Human values?
Now, Bentham with his Utilitarianism philosophy comes in to play. We can do again a little game because that's the trademark of certain organizations, small games like riddles and things hidden in plain sight. If you look at the death of Aristotle and combine it with the date of death of Bentham, we have 322 and 1832. Bentham’s body was preserved, his head was mummified but his body had to exist of bones, so no mummification. His head was missing. Why all these facts? Well, considering the fact that humans heard enough theories I will leave this one to you to realize. Small tips would be reading philosophy books and questioning the world societies. Again something hidden in plain sight in the form of a joke to the initiates. Indeed that is the humor of people that know things others don't. They love it when you see it right in front of you but you have no idea of such a thing.
If the goal would be to achieve the most amount of happiness how they would do it? And they give you the choice to decide if decision is ethically and/or morally correct. So when it is achieved then ethics or morals are respected, it does not matter how many people are involved and how the happiness is divided between the people. Looks great right? But, if 6 people are just 'FINE' and 1 person is extremely happy, then this person is happy enough that its person happiness is bigger than when all 7 are all just 'fine' then this is ethically correct and morally a right thing to do. Here we come to something that is called sacrifice. It is allowed that some people have to sacrifice themselves for the total amount of happiness. So, can you try to figure out how many people are actually sacrificing themselves and do they even know they do such a sacrifice?
Can you see that people who are addicted to status and luxury, the people who get the feeling that they are better than all the rest, that they own the world, that those people do reach a higher state of happiness compared to people that don't really care about material and do care about other people instead of own interest?
This is what Aristotle thinks. No man can have more than a certain amount of property, possessions or wealth. He is very strict and clear about these rules in his works. So do we have a problem? If the economy was based on exchange of goods there was indeed a problem, but Karl Marx and the banking system provide the solution. You take your money and you hand it out as a loan. Then, you actually don't have a lot of capital but each month you get a certain amount that covers your LUXURIOUS EXPENSES.
This way you can avoid Aristotle and Plato's advice on how Life works and the Laws of nature. This way you escape the possible negative force when having too much, and you use Marx theory on how to fully use your workers for your own advantage. By time, you give those workers loans so you don't break the Natural Laws Ancient Philosophers talk about. And above all, these loans give you more money because of the interest. They also have to pay interest on loans. But don't worry the Bentham’s way of life solves the problem. Everything is fucking ethical and morally accepted.
With contracts everything of this is very possible because it is legal and under the laws. No loans, no investments, no labor contracts, etc.
If money controls workers and money controls the energy of the workers, then money controls energy. If the market is based on money and money controls the workers and energy then who is the stock? They don't give humans such information.
This whole speech might seem a little unknown, strange and a joke. Why so? Because that's the way they speak to humans. Their playground because of human lack of knowledge. When people who know more then you, tease you with riddles you don't understand, make sure that they think you are really stupid. The riddles will become much easier because they think you're stupid. Keep track of things, connect dots and see where the path actually is moving. By reading books randomly humans will not know the truth. They can only assume what they call a truth. There are humans who do know. When you meet people who treat you this way, you can become angry or feel like you are rejected, or you can play the game. If you are smart in a way they will joke with harder riddles. So be a smart man, play a stupid Muppet for the masters, deceive them, manipulate them, study psychology, take and use the information and let them become the puppets while thinking they are still the masters.
Because that's what they have done and still are doing to all humans. That is where all begins. That is still a long journey on human behalf. Do not let yourself fall at the beginning, because underneath it is much more beautiful than outside. Do not let others deceive you with routines and everyday ‘life’. Everything starts here!
Your Support is Appreciated !
by 
Join our community at https://discord.gg/CN9Gb4m
