And this is the essential difference between the Neswish and, well, let's say, Egon Schiele's paintings, right? Because one is artistically doing someone else's brief. Very well, has art within it, but it's not generated from the artist. So I think, you know, moving forward, if you look at it to this scene we're in now, there's a couple of things that are really important.
I think that's intention and being very genuine about it. We all want to make work. We will make work too, depending on our fiscal situation, to sell.
That's fine. Artists should sell, but they should also feel free to make unpopular work just to put it out there. And as we said, if it's dark, it doesn't matter.
If you feel like you're genuinely making a point and the intention is true to yourself and how you see it should be, then I think that's groovy. But we should be very honest about it. I think honesty is, especially in these sort of scenes, spoken social audio, we should be very genuine and honest about it.
First of all, I love Egon Schiele. He's one of my favourite people out there, artists. But it just crossed my mind that even though you were comparing them on two poles, but the message is what's making a difference.
It's not the logo itself, but what the logo represents besides the shoes of the Just Do It. It has grown to become a message. Maybe it started out as, just do it, go buy the shoe or whatever.
I don't know the history of it, but it has morphed into something different now, hasn't it? Or am I... Yeah, absolutely. Because we know. If you look at art history and the movement of art history in the 20th century, modern art... Sorry if I'm banging on, I'm going to have a quick rant.
No, no, no, please, it's so wonderful. Please be patient with me. But if you look at the dawn of psychology from Freud onwards and the movement of modern art of this last century, there are parallels.
