Well, hi. This is Val Campbell and I have been doing a lot of thinking lately about the whole Charlie Kirk situation. I posted something within the last couple of weeks, a list of my concerns having to do with what we were being told in the official narrative and how it didn't make sense.
There are hundreds, probably thousands of posts now on YouTube and on various social media platforms of everybody talking about this, and I think that that's great. I think it's important that we continue to keep this upfront and center. I'm concerned about public fatigue. This is a psychological process that's known, and I think that the bad guys are counting on it. They're counting on this getting so overwhelming that there's going to be so much about it, and then after a time people are just going to get numb. It's going to be like, "I don't want to hear about that anymore. I want to get on to the next thing."
We've seen this over and over again in history. Obviously the bad guys are aware of the psychology of the public, and I think we need to really, really keep that in mind from all different angles. But I can't let this thing just totally go. I don't want to be posting every day and talking about the latest thing or the latest theory or what this person's saying or what that person's saying, right? I've really held off of that, although I have been talking to a lot of people. It's a subject on the street. So, as you're running into somebody, you're saying, "Did you hear this thing or did you see this latest thing?"
I want to point out that there is a principle at stake here, a principle at play. And that principle is, well, first off, there's innocent until proven guilty. And then there's a second principle that I think is very, very important here, and it is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This becomes very critical in this case because as you have hundreds, thousands of people, thousands, tens of thousands maybe, I don't know, that are looking at this official narrative.
I was at the dump today, literally of all places, the transfer station. We're throwing cardboard in the recycle bin and I strike up a conversation with the guy next to me and he's a hunter. We're talking about this and he said the same thing. He says, "Look, I don't know exactly what happened, but there's no way—there is no way—that that was an entry wound from a .306. I hunt with a .306. I've seen it tumble deer straight over backwards. I've seen that ballistic round." He said it would have made an enormous hole coming out the other side, and there's no way that anything involving a human neck is going to stop it from exploding out the backside.
I mean, this guy hunts deer with a .306. I've shot .306. I've shot .3030s. I've shot 7.62 by 39s. All 30 caliber rounds. We know what this ballistic does. Okay, the whole scenario of this, we might have disagreements on the rooftop question or this or that or something else, but there are thousands, tens of thousands of subject matter experts, maybe not on the whole realm, but in individual pieces who have tremendous amounts of experience who have looked at this and said, "There's no way. That official narrative makes zero sense. It doesn't make any sense."
So, how does that play into this idea that they're rushing this kid into the legal system? This Tyler Robinson, rushing this guy into the legal system, and they have publicly announced that they're going to seek the death penalty. How does this not prejudice juries? This is too big of a trial. This is too big of an issue. Everybody knows about it. Everybody's got an opinion. How does this become an impartial jury? This is just bizarre.
In fact, that's what another thing this guy said. He said, "I don't see any way that they don't find this guy guilty just because they've got to pin this on somebody. They've got to move it through." And I said, "That might be the case, but the more of us that are talking about this, the more people that are standing up and not giving in to media fatigue, raises the bar for the bad guys." We all know who a lot of them are.
We don't need to go down that path because I don't know who's the specific here, but there's some in our government, some in every government. These are the underground people. These are the alphabet companies or the alphabet agencies, right? You know what we're saying. And that's who plots and plans these things for whatever purpose we don't know exactly.
