Any of the governments that claim "consent of the governed" cannot prove full jurisdiction in a court of law. They can't do this because they don't actually have jurisdiction. This is not the case with military courts however, they make you sign a document where you give them jurisdiction. The civilians, on the other hand, have never a document of this nature. Therefore if in a civil case, before you have actually been arraigned i.e. during arraignment, you ask a judge if the prosecution has submitted any factual evidence of jurisdiction they will not be able to say "yes". There is no factual evidence of jurisdiction that can be submitted therefore jurisdiction can not be proven in a court of law. If the court can not prove jurisdiction over you they can not try the case and the case should be dismissed. What this means is that you don't have to follow civil laws in these countries if you don't want to as the laws don't apply to you. They don't have jurisdiction. Their are many examples of this being true. Joe Pierce, from Ethical Anarchism Articulated, has proven this by getting drug charges dismissed and many other small nonviolent charges dismissed as well. Mark Stevens helps teach people how to use this to get out of traffic charges. Learn the law and why it doesn't apply. We humans can be free from regulation if we choose to be, we just have to stand up for ourselves en masse. If you want to check out Joe's channel go here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMFSCfI-BxS4YRNjXXaEJNQ If you want to check out Mark's channel go here: https://www.youtube.com/user/nostateproject
Thank you for reading this post. Please upvote it, resteem it and comment below.
