(Answer) Yes, many have become, and they will be too. Like Chabadogya Upanishad, Jabal Rishi Ankkatakul, Vishwamitra Kshatriya Varna in Mahabharata and Matang Rishi Chandal had become Brahmin from Total. Even now, the one who is good in nature, is worthy of the Brahmin's capable and foolish son, and so will be even further.
(Question) Well, what is the state that can be changed from the semen to semen, how can it be changed to another character?
(Answer:) Raj is not a Brahmin body with the sum of semen, but-
Swadhyayen japairohastravedia
Mahayyaganish Yajnachcha Brahmee Kriyat Tanu .. Manu ..
The meaning of this has come from the past and now here also in a nutshell. To teach the reading (Jupai): To study the ritual of dynasty home, to the entire Vedas, with words, meanings, relation, vowel, to teach (Eyyaaya) Parnamasi, Ishti etc., aforementioned (saintly) from the religion aforesaid (Mahayyankya) aforesaid Brahmmajya, Devyagya, Pitriya, Vaishdevayyaan and Guest man, (Yagnesh) Agnishomamadi - Yagna, with scholars, honors, truth speech, Pakaradi from Vrttne in shatkarma and Sreshtachar left Dushtachar full Shilpvidyadi read (Iym) it (Tonuः) the body (Brahmi) (Kriyte) Brahmin. Do not you accept this verse? Believe it. Then why do you believe in the system of semantics with the use of semen? I do not believe alone, but many people believe in tradition.
(Question) Will you deny tradition also?
(Answer) No, but do not believe your incomprehensible understanding.
(Question) What is the proof in our vomit and your subtle understanding?
(Answer) This is the proof that those five five generations are considered to be eternal practices, and we consider the tradition of the Vedas and the beginning of creation till today. Look! The father of his father is his son, the wicked and his son is the best father of his father, and both of them appear to be superior or wicked, so you are confused. Look! What Manu Maharaj has said -
Yenasya Phero Yata Yen Yata Dadmahahah.
Tin yayatsatanta path tena nganchan rishte .. Manu ..
The way in which his father, father, has gone, children should go in the same path, but in the path of those who are righteous (father-in-law), father and patriarch, do not walk in their path. Because walking in the path of noble godly men never leads to sorrow. Do you believe this or not? Yes, yes. And see what is the illuminating thing of God that is eternal and that is against it can never be eternal. Should such a person accept or not? Must definitely
If you do not believe that someone's father is poor, his son is wealthy, should he give money to his father's pride with the pride of his father? Is the father whose father is blind, the son of his own son should be bitten? Whose father's father is a liar, will his son also do wrong? Not-but not everyone who is a good man of men, consuming them and abandoning evil deeds is very important to all. If a person does not believe in the varna rama-system by the use of yoga and the use of virtues, then he should ask that why do not those who believe that Brahmin, who has fallen from his character, has become lowly, endless or agnostic, a Muslim? It is here that he has given up the deeds of Brahmin, so he is not a Brahmin. This also proves that those who do excellent deeds of Brahmagni, are Brahmagnis and those who are of lowly character, character, nature of good character, if they work in the best character and who are deserving of good character, Must count.
Read next