There are hundreds of organizations seeking to promote individual freedom with all sorts of ways to achieve a "free society". I can list them off by hand, although it seems like a waste of space as I'm sure you are familiar with at least one group that is dedicated to getting rid of the State or finding someway of making society more free.
I hope for the best and we would all end up living in a more humane world, yet no such thing can be done.
Society can't be made free, only individuals who make the effort to be free, may become free. Remember, society is nothing but a convenient label for a certain amount of individuals; and out of all the humans alive today a great majority are either set in their ways, not fitted for individual freedom, or frankly just don't want it. The history of proselytizing for liberty has also not been very pretty, they have all been co-opted or surpassed beyond recognition.
Even if it were possible to somehow change society to become free say with the switch of a button, would it be right to do so?
I believe in only one thing: liberty; but I do not believe in liberty enough to want to force it upon anyone. —HL Mencken
You can start to piss off a lot of people by telling them how they should live. Everyone has a different idea of what liberty amounts to, there are even people who say they want to be free while in reality they support dominant forms of control: political action, compulsory schooling, propaganda, taxation, national defense, central banking, forced-vaccinations, immigration restrictions, statutory laws, licensing, and so on. Many of them are even self-described as libertarians or anarchists, it makes you wonder what is it they really value.
The rare individual who actually cares about individual freedom has no use for such organizational methods apart from letting others have at if that's what the freedom advocate genuinely believes is the best course of action. Rather, the individualist knows the plain truth that there is nothing inherent in organizations or institutions to bring about freedom compared to solely individual action. It's not in the nature of liberty to use the same collective means as all anti-freedom ideologies have done in the past.
Suppose a portion of the world is hungry, which is indeed true, do you not feed yourself until the problem of hunger is solved? Or what if you have the opportunity to opt-out of fiat by buying cryptocurrency, are you going to wait until everyone else in the planet has a chance?
Common sense informs us that freedom comes from individual volition and nothing else. No reasonable person who wants to control their sovereignty will deny themselves the ability to think about and eventually make their own choices for their own betterment, it's a silly notion.
Once you come to terms with this realization you'll find little importance in what a free society would look like, instead focusing on the more pressing issue of how to be free as possible.
