Adoption means nothing unless value increases. What point would there be in 100 million people using Steem if its value remained at it's current price of just over $0.13? What you really need to do is

Indeed! There are a number of things that I do not like about what Trump says and does, but I certainly like him much better than any of the current alternatives. I think the World will become a much better

Yes, but those are very small merchants which accept Steem, and most are only local. Steem does not appear to be accepted by any large retailers, and by none from North America or Europe/Asia where the

Bitcoin will have a much higher percentage, the main reason being that Bitcoin has been around a lot longer and is now accepted as a medium of currency by a number of online retailers. Steem on the other

The best part of the so-called "impeachment trial" will be that it will virtually guarantee President Trump's re-election in November.

"Today Steemit now has over one million registered million users." The number of "registered" users means nothing. Just like Twitter, facebook, and a host of other such sites (present

A "wealth tax" on the rich will not work! The rich are those who own and control our companies and industries. Taxing them further will only cause them to pass those extra costs along to consumers

A snowball would have a much better chance of surviving in hell, than Bernie Sanders has of becoming the DNC nominee, let alone ever becoming President. Neither will ever happen!

Yes, you can! You can also find answers to most questions you may have here:

Unless you have a higher reputation than the member you are downvoting, your downvote has no effect...it literally means nothing.

Unfortunately if you lost your passwords / keys to your old account, there is no way to retrieve them. That is why it is so important to write them down, or save them in more than 1 location.

If you lost your Steemit password, how were you able to create this post?

"This link might help." There is nothing at that link which shows how curator rewards are actually split among curators which is he whole point of this dialog.

" I'm pretty certain it's split up based on the amount of steem power put into the upvotes." I would agree with that! But do you honestly believe that with an average curator payout of US $0.66

I agree with you completely with regards to Joe Parys being a scammer, although he seems to have a much better reputation here on Steemit than you have suggested. My earlier point however was not intended

Thank you very much for your explanations on everything. But regardless of those explanations, when a post that your are expecting a US $0.66 upvote reward per curator pays you less than US $0.01 (99%

Ok, here is a prime example of how funds are not being paid out as claimed: The above post shows a total payout of $11.88; $5.94 for the Author, and $5.94 for the Curators. There were just 9 Curators (myself

Ok, here is a prime example of how funds are not being paid out as claimed: The above post shows a total payout of $11.88; $5.94 for the Author, and $5.94 for the Curators. There were just 9 Curators (myself

While it may be true that the US has the highest rate in the world of children living with single parents, that is not necessarily a bad thing. What such stats fail to take into consideration is the fact

"I see you received total of 701 steem transferred and you sent total of 20 steem to like resteem bots few weeks ago so that is why you only have 680 steem in your pocket." You are missing the