Hi there @patrickulrich, @edicted. I control @community321 on the Hive chain. I do not, and have never, controlled it on the Steem chain. I am not related to Stinc in any way. Explanation: I was on Twitter,

test

a pro-hive person who could easily be masking these transactions just verified this with Steem.js manually BTW, it doesn't appear steemd is lying. it means that @anonsteem stored the keys of created accounts

Account recovery wasn't used to takeover community321. Whoever compromised community321 determined its private keys. (not that much is changed by the difference)

Where can I find the source code?

I don't see how there could be legal ramifications for not processing transactions? Witnesses are free to process whatever transactions they feel like, and @themarkymark has decided to run node software

: This comment is a thread for the Finally Comments System. Visit for more info.

They might do that, or they might have one central bridge account.

Well it doesn't exist so IDK. But I hope that you'll be able to link a Steem account to Medium, and have comments bridged over by a Medium-ran bot on your posts.

As for the botnet, I wouldn't be suprised if Gab, in #2, tried to do something like that. There wasn't much promotion in the Gab community for the vote, it's hard to see how they got to #2. Hacker Noon

With a little network request inspection, you can figure out how all networks did, not just the top 3. Here are the full results: Steemit: 4020 votes gab: 2903 votes Narrative - The World's Journal: 1041

They mention in the post that they "hope that the Medium Team will consider integrating Steem". If that actaully happens it would be great for Steem. A Medium-Steem bridge would be awesome.

implemented an ip-filter I think they did. why was hackernoon able to verify that people voted multiple times My guesses for multiple voting are: Clickjacking on the Noonies page. Making your botnet vote

Well they were only worth ~$0.00002, practcally making no difference. Here, I'll upvote you with my serveral accounts in a bit.

That doesn't prove I'm a witness? That just shows I approved a witness. Here's a similar screenshot from you: Although I am technically a witness, I have never produced any blocks, and became a witness

VP "costs" money It doesn't cost money to downvote, it costs VP. I didn't say that VP costs money. And until HF21, it will cost VP that could otherwise be used to upvote yourself. designed to

Burning cards for their DEC value is almost never profitable. The DEC burn value effectively creates a floor to how low the price of a card can go, and most of the time selling on the market is the way

Keep in mind that it costs VP to downvote (and hide comments). If that comment was upvoted by ~$0.05 then it would be visible again. The downvoters of that comment only did so with a rather small downvote.

Just wondering: is it possible to choose between Hong Kong and mainland China? That could make a difference for some users, I think.

What seems questionable? It seems like the wording is pretty solid to me. The obligations of everyone is well-defined. I can't think of a way that either could get out of their obligations while fufilling