What seems questionable? It seems like the wording is pretty solid to me. The obligations of everyone is well-defined. I can't think of a way that either could get out of their obligations while fufilling the contract. That is, except for the
or its equivalent in another crypto
line. IMO that could be a little problematic for @neoxian if
@mango-juice tries:
SCAMNEOXIANSCAMNEOXIANSCAMNEOXIAN at 1 STEEM, making SCAMNEOXIAN "worth" 1 STEEMSCAMNEOXIAN to (of course I don't think @mango-juice will do that)
So while there is some wording that can be used to scam @neoxian, this is only a problem for
@neoxian, and I can't see anything questionable that could be used against the loaner by
@neoxian.
RE: The Firefly Bank of Neoxian: daily contracts: 2019-08-13