So, I believe that he did provide information. Do I have any evidence of that? No. Is it sealed in a court somewhere? Probably.
Like, that information might be out there. But now, are they going to release that to the public? You know, I don't see that happening. No, they're not allowed to.
And the second question I have is regarding Galene Maxwell's appeal and all the drama that's kind of surrounding that regarding whether or not she had this NPA that didn't carry through other states. So, basically, you know, since it was a federal charge, he ended up with the two state charges instead. But they're saying, you know, there's kind of like a little bit of a murky area where her lawyers are trying to claim that she shouldn't have been able to be prosecuted under that agreement.
Yeah, that's going to go to the Supreme Court, too, just so everybody knows. They're more than likely going to have to rule on that. Otherwise, the federal government will never have supremacy in cases like this where they should have supremacy.
If the Supreme Court decides not to look at this, it's not good for everybody. It literally, like, weakens the federal government. And I get – some people are going to be happy about that, right? Wait, wait, wait.
If they decide not to look at it, that would destroy it, meaning that they're not going to – they would go back to previous ruling, which the previous ruling said that they upheld. Yeah, which is state's power. State would be the preemptive.
Pause for a second. Let me finish my thought. The reason being is – so back in 2024, there was a FOIA request made for these documents regarding Epstein's evidence.
And the judge in June denied that release based on the fact that Galen has this ongoing appeal. And depending on what happens to it, the possibility that she could end up in another trial. That is one of the possible outcomes.
Like, nothing could happen. She could get thrown – you know, could get thrown out. Or she could end up having another trial.
