In the development of Western Philosophy, there arose a number of philosophers who issued arguments that may be said God-centric, such as Spinoza and Hegel.
Hegel once said that philosophy has no object other than God and philosophy is essentially a rational theology.
Such metaphysical arguments and views are criticized for their all-out, murdered, metaphysical views that at least position God's existence in science apart from the whole of his thinking (in this case by the Bertrand Russell-driven analytic philosophical movement). Until Hegel's popular idea is only partial in historical, social and political philosophy: historical dialectics, phenomenology, etc.
Furthermore, maybe their thinking is too big to be considered unimportant. The solution is to offer a new approach for example in continuing Hegel's thinking through the so-called non-metaphysical view of Hegel or Hegel's approach of thinking without his metaphysical / divine view.
Western philosophy has universally killed the theistic possibilities arguments in its historical motion. Somehow they are so anti-God. Let not the God-speaking cleric, the philosopher himself would be all-out against if they tried to carry the name of God in his argument
