The question of God is one of humanity’s deepest debates. Both science and philosophy offer their fair share of insight and intellectual disclosure, yet they both bring in nuances and skeptical complexities. These studies of experimentation and pursuit of knowledge have never sufficeed to bring an ultimatum into the existence of Gos debate.
philosophy has arguments for anything but so does science. the early models of atoms. even evolution had tons of smart sounding but wrong arguments before better ones replaced them. It’s not a flaw that’s how reasoning works.
The truth is people can twist logic and pretty much anything else to prove anything. And yeah even evil gods. but real arguments for god don’t stop at just any god. They logically build toward a specific kind of god based on the kind of universe we see. No serious philosophical tradition argues for an all evil god who is also the ground of being source of logic and sustainer of existence. It’s like saying quantum theory could support any wild fantasy.
Now this is me speaking completely throwing out philosophy and science out the door. I feel like the truth is in such a nuanced discussion where all reasoning, evaluations and analysis peaks at its very limit it all falls back into a grey area, where both ends can’t satisfy. But all arguments still validate as such to varying degrees but regardless are arguments that should be considered since the two significant alternatives (philosophy and science) has only taken us so far. I’m not trying to prove Gods existence. But none of the arguments for his existence shouldn’t just be flinched away either. Personally I’ve never disregarded even the most skewed theories especially if such a phenomenon hasn’t been fully understood or deciphered.
