One of the many subplots in the general efforts to commoditize humanity (i.e. convert people into lab rats for experimentation toward immortality by those who defy God and/or human creation) is the handover

Jeff is the very first of those whom I follow that mentioedn the obvious: "AI"" isn't "AI". "AI" is controlled "AI", programmed by those with an agenda.

The sad part about "23&me/ancestry.com" scam affects you whether one has submitted one's inforamtion or not. There are many instances where "authorities" were not able to match

So much technology from Apple! They prmise to be able to completely distort reality so much so that you won't be able to discern reality from virtual reality! How wonderful! Is there a "Prisoner"

While I agree wholeheartedly with the views expressed here, I have a couple of quibbles: We talk a lot about "democracy", but in most situations, the "winner" does not represent the

The "Marvel Comics Universe" deliberately left the personage and saga of "Adam Warlock" out of its "Infinity Gauntlet" phase, even though in the original comic version, Warlock

"They could put anyone in there! Even a 5 year old! They could easily make a mockery of the whole system..." Isn't this exactly what is happening with the US Presidency? A peanut farmer, a hollywood

I often hear criticism of the "anonymity" of the internet or of social media platform, but IMO the problem is that there isn't ENOUGH anonymity. IMO, the internet is for sharing of ideas, not

A common mistake is being made here. When a government official mentions things like "threats", that official means "threats to government control", not "threat to the public".

While not endorsing any candidate, nor any government at all, the flip flop of the US population is quite interesting. In 1941-1945, the US government fought with the Russians against the Nazis, but now

Quibble with your assessment of the French "pension" riots: The action was of course tremendously unpopular, as if governments, who exist solely to ensure their dominance over humanity, would

Counterpoint: what about respect for another's beliefs? If you were to enter a synagogue, would you refuse to wear a yarmulke? IMO, wearing a yarmulke doesn't signify that I am a follower of the Jewish

Waiting for Ruddick to either die in a "horrible accident", or to be found with "child pornography" on a number of his electronic devices, or maybe he'll simply "disappear".

This "AI" is a canard. Just like an old TI calculator, one doesn't simply mash a bunch of microelectronics together and produce "intelligence". "AI" doesn't invent anything,

The obvious democratic nominee is Gavin Newsom, the "Mitt Romney of the Republicans". He will make Trudeau look like an anarchist. Not that any other candidate (of any party) would bring any

Someone with more talent than I should clip this from 1:02:00 to 1:03:20 and paste it everywhere.

I exhort you greatly to listen to the Firesign Theatre's "Waiting for the Electrician or Someone Like Him" from 1968. I hope that enjoy as much as I did when I first heard it many years ago.

I find your assessment of "AI" as an autonomous "being" to be wildly overdone. There is no "artificial intelligence". There is a very quick compiler of facts, programmed by

George Carlin once joked: Person A: "My needs aren't being met" Carlin: "well, drop some of your needs." :) Just recently, we heard super-environmental climate change czar John Kerry

The whole idea that "sure, what the public wants is transparency, but those that work in government have a duty to keep those secrets" simply underscores that there is an inherent conflict between