Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg believes that Facebook is no longer the previous Facebook.
Many people agree with him. However, not only the influence of Facebook, technology companies and monopolies have begun to talk about.
Due to the possibility of policymakers out of control, Facebook and Google will break the organization.
"The world is full of anxiety and fragmentation." Facebook has a lot to do to make sure the Facebook community can prevent the spread of hatred, protect state intervention, and spend too much time on Facebook.
My personal challenge in 2018 is to solve these important issues.
Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg told his plan this year. He understood his challenge from this article.
But in this case, what are the main challenges?
The Silicon Valley technology in the United States has become a major market for critics. The controversial issue surrounding Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google is that they must break the monopoly of these agencies. Cut into small pieces to do a small company?
Those who represent it say that many technical organizations are more empowered. In the past decade, data management has lost control of some Western organizations. They monopolize their operations and become a threat to political policies.
So what is the solution? In the manner in which standard well companies were broken in the twentieth century, policymakers broke down technical institutions in this way. But there is one person who opposes it. They said that these agencies have the power to change the people's destiny.
Google's Facebook network has brought changes to the daily lives of billions of people around the world. A study conducted by Intelligence Squared found that 39% of the people were about to break these institutions.
24% of organizations are in favor of survival. But thirty-seven percent have not made any decision yet. Earlier, the survey results at the end of 2016 were the opposite.
Many people think technology companies make the world beautiful. but now? Technology is now the biggest allegation against world-renowned organizations.
Each institution is bigger than a country. Policymakers do not have any control over whether they are companies or competitors.
Controlling a single ruling, addictive, threatening democracy is now the worst!
What is the outcome of the complaint? This giant turned out to be control. Regulators are financing. Politicians are criticizing the critics.
Even those who loudly speak out loud to these organizations will turn away. They warn the harmful aspects of these organizations.
Recently, a former employee working for the world's largest company formed a company called "Human Technology Center."
In the Economist's report, these organizations are called "BAADD" or "Bad." The complete form of this form is: Big or Big in B, anti-competitive or anti-competitive in A, AD or A-addictive in A, D in democracy or democracy.
Those tech companies that work for the well-being of their people are not good for buyers because of their exclusive business. Technical analysts say policymakers have started to study the issue.
