[SPS] Proposal for the agreement of the down-voting standards
■ Proposal for the agreement of the down-voting standards
1. Overview
Down-voting activities have been increased after HF22 allowed free downvoting pools.
In STEEM blockchain, down-voting is a way of expressing negative opinions or disliking content, and can be used by anyone.
However, when there is no public consensus within the community on the standards of down-voting, down-voting can be perceived as a means of discrimination.
As one of the representatives for the South Korean Steem community, we take some down-voting cases very seriously because they are focusing on non-English postings, including Korean postings with unclear reasons.
These kinds of behaviors are not consistent with the #new-steem intent of "providing appropriate compensation for good content" or with the Steem blockchain ideology advocating censorless SNS.
Example 1: A post that has been down-voted due to the missing thumbnail image.
https://steempeak.com/kr/@jaydih/78plbz
Example 2: A post dealing with the loss of a friend, in sorrowful emotion, has been down-voted. It is very rude to down-vote a post with this type of content, rather than supporting a person that has lost someone close to them.
https://steempeak.com/zzan/@dodoim/24bfjn
Steem Blockchain is the space where members of different cultures and languages stay together.
If down-voting is a necessary means for a Steem-blockchain, we believe that the clear consensus among community members on the down-voting criteria is required. In addition, we think that down-voting activities beyond the agreed-upon criteria should be prohibited.
Based on this context, SCT community proposes the following down-voting criteria:
(1) Clear plagiarism
(2) Posting of personal attack against others
(3) Posting dissemination of false facts (fake news)
(4) Postings related to crime simulation and criminal activity
(5) Racist Posting
- In addition to the down-voting criteria, we also propose implementing features that allow users to choose the reason for down-voting.
2. Implementation
Community developers can generate a reason-for-down-voting feature in PR and submit it to a public repository or submit a development proposal with the same content to the SPS.
3. How to Vote
4. Purpose of the Proposal
This proposal is created to record the community's opinion on down-voting criteria within the community in Steem-Blockchain as a consensus manner.
5. What Happens if this Proposal Gets Approved?
If this proposal has been approved, all Steem community members should try to follow these down-voting standards.
6. Proposers
- Witness :
@ayogom
@proxy.token
- Community(founder) : AAA(
@triplea.reviews
@virus707), ROR(
@roadofrich), SAGODA(
@sagoda
@ksc), SCT(
@sct
@jack8831), ZZAN(
@steemzzang
@cjsdns)
- Community CN :
@deanliu
@ericet
@honoru
- Community KR :
@abdullar
@ahnpeter
@appletree0831
@aquabox
@asd5710
@banguri
@bizbenturer
@bluengel
@bulsik
@cheolwoo-kim
@corn113
@cyberrn
@dakeshi
@donekim
@dorian-lee
@dozam
@eagleowl
@enviro
@epitt925
@feelsogood
@fenrir78
@floridasnail
@free.zzan
@freegon
@garamee21
@gfriend96
@gghite
@glory7
@goodhello
@happy-banguri
@happyberrysboy
@himapan
@hodolbak
@holic7
@honeybeerbear
@hyokhyok
@innovit
@ioioioioi
@isi3
@jacobyu
@jeehun
@jjy
@joeypark
@jsquare
@jungch98
@jungjunghoon
@kcc
@kibumh
@kingbit
@kitalee
@kiwifi
@kopasi
@kungdel
@kwonjs77
@lonose
@lovelyyeon
@lucky2
@lucky2015
@machellin
@minutebuddhism
@naha
@newbijohn
@new-jersey
@noisysky
@onespringday
@parisfoodhunter
@parkname
@pharm.steemit
@philhyuntd
@powerego
@rainingfall
@ramires
@realmankwon
@relaxkim
@ryanhkr
@sct.cu19
@sct.cu7
@seraphim502
@seunglimdaddy
@skymin
@skyoi
@smongo
@solar-junely
@sonki999
@soosoo
@tailcock
@talkit
@tiamo1
@tjayhas
@tommycoin
@tradingideas
@trueimagine
@twinpapa
@ukk
@uzgo
@vip
@wisdomandjustice
@wonsama
@ybc
@ziq
@zzan.blue
@zzangu
@zzings