I'm replying this argument in the screenshot because it seems like a good argument to the untrained eye.
The poster has just made a good point about how different creatures on Earth experience existence differently and connected it with the obvious likelihood that other phenomena like UFOs, Aliens, and God might operate differently too the same way the different creatures on Earth operate differently.
This all adds up, it makes perfect sense except in the case of the religious God.
If the poster is referring to the God phenomenon away from any religion then it makes perfect sense because away from religion no attributes are ascribed to the God phenomenon except that he created the world and we know nothing about him. But if he is referring to the God referred to in religions then what he has said doesn't make any sense.
Because, according to religion, the religious God doesn't only claim to have created the world but claims to be a lot of other things that and because of all those claims he can no longer be absolved by the argument that we probably don't understand how he operates due to the fact that our experience of existence might be in the way.
According to Religion, the Religious God claims to be a lot of things, he claims to be all loving, all good, all powerful, all present, and he claims to desperately want a close relationship with humans, amongst other things.
A God who makes all these claims cannot at the same time be said to be operating in a way humans won't understand as a result of differences in perception of reality.
Because even if it was true that the God operates in a way we don't understand the fact that he desperately loves us and wants a close relationship with humans, like religion claims, would make him bridge the difference between our perception of reality in order to connect with us properly.
And remember he can easily do this because he is all-powerful.
So, it is that simple, a desperate love and need for connection and an ability to do all things cannot exist side by side with a misunderstanding caused by difference in perception of reality.
Just imagine you love your dog or cat so much and want to relate with it and have intimate talks with it and on top of that you have the power to make them talk or have the power to talk to them in a language they'll understand, but instead of doing that you keep communicating with it with Chinese sign language that it doesn't understand and would never understand. Is this not too dumb to accept?
One might make the argument that "oh, the fact still remains that he operates differently and you'll never understand what he does, it would sound dumb to you because you don't understand it"
And the counter argument would have to be that the dog/cat is not to blame for not understanding Chinese sign language, the burden of communication is on the one who desperately wants to communicate, who also happens to have the ability to communicate on top of that, if they have all that and wouldn't bridge the communication barrier the dog's/cat's only resort should be to ignore.
The End
Hi there, buy my novella Professor Otagburuagu. It promises to be thoroughly entertaining and intellectually stimulating. Written by myself and illustrated by Scandinavian artist @ katharsisdrill.
You can order the hard copy from anywhere in the world via this link:
https://katharsisdrill.art/the-katharsisdrill-shop/professor-otagburuagu/
Thank you!
