The reasons why I ask are quite relevant and worth spending some thought fuel on. After all, we tend to be too comfortable singing to a cheerleading audience, but no doubt, repeating what everyone already thinks, the talking points that everyone already seems to agree on, is possibly not as productive, and more so, possibly nothing remotely close to self improvement.
Now don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to pull a Tony Robbins here or anything that lame, I'm trying to talk about something of substance, something most of us should care about.
I for one feel very grateful for my experience on the whole cryptosphere, and I say that while I'm also including the times I've made terrible and I do mean terrible calls. The whole process has been one of growth, a difficult path of learning, of practicing skepticism and critical thinking.
I think along those lines, the things we write about, the experiences can translate to other platforms and even more so reach across the room to make them more relatable to people who are at different stages of their journey.
But here is the interesting element that we might be missing out on. Let's say that we are blogging, documenting our journey on one of these platforms, but the way we talk, the way we address the audience sort of speak is so akin to shilling, as it's called these days, that the effect it has, the result is the opposite. It hurts the outward projection of the platform. Is that a possibility?
No doubt times are changing, and social media, traditional social media is dying a slow painful death. But I think it's pretty much up to us to be astute on how we take some of that ground back.
