Let me school you a bit.
You all shouting Chelsea doesn't own a stadium? Do you even understand what property acquisition is?
Now listen. Your club bought a land and built a stadium right? Mine rented a stadium? Right?
Now what are the differences?
They all paid to get what they want.
They both use it to play home matches without interruptions and or anyone else claiming it's their home.
They both Generate revenues from the stadium.
So business profit is what matters there, so what exactly is the problem with you and Chelsea? 馃ぃNo problem with Chelsea sir.... I can move or relocate at any given fucking time but you can't sir without large group of people (Chelsea pitch owners)
In a nutshell... Chelsea no get stadium 馃槀馃槀馃槀Go claim your landlord house as your own na
Since no difference btw rented and ownedYou are funny o 馃ぃ.. No need to claim anything 馃槀.. Business is what we are doing there.It's actually easier for Chelsea to move and or relocate anytime. Wtf are you talking about? 馃ぃWho is arguing owning Stanford Bridge with you?