Hate Speech and the Flood-Control Controversy in the Philippines

Today, an increasing number of Filipinos have been venting their outrage on the internet over allegations of corruption in government flood-control programs. A number of these flood-control projects have been under scrutiny in recent government probes for being "ghost," shoddy, or ineffective, and a number have gone to court. Because flooding can threaten communities and disrupt the economy and public safety, it is natural that the public expect government officials and contractors to make the projects transparent and responsible.

And this case brings us back to an even larger issue surrounding hate speech and freedom of expression. Citizens have a right to hold politicians accountable, and to speak out against the use of taxpayer dollars. Calling for an investigation into an official, seeking greater transparency, or raising concerns about a well-documented government action can all fall under proper political debate. An official's status as public servant doesn't deny them proper treatment.

Similarly, some criticism may be too much when it is threatening or may promote violence or goes after individuals based on their identity instead of their actions. To use a common example, it is as problematic to describe someone, especially a public official, as "corrupt" as a known fact who has merely been accused or under investigation. This is the case for some officials and others who have been charged with related to suspected flood-control irregularities. (Philippine News Agency+1)

Social media – which is a complex animal, a mixed blessing – unfortunately tiptoes along this tightrope: Filipinos should be free to hold those in power accountable, when their actions, or misactions, concern public resources and public safety; but Filipinos should also be certain of the reality before spreading allegations. Criticism need not be hate speech; words are not necessarily illegal.

The flood control battle illustrates why we have this freedom and why we promote responsible dialogue. Citizens should be able to criticize power in the in law, but the argument should be about the proof, actions, and liability of the politician, rather than with threats, violence, and unsubstantiated personal insults. This gives all the citizens a voice in public discussion.

#hl-exclusive

#friendship #hl-w235e3
#indiaunited #ecency #life #hive #hiveph #philipppines #ladiesofhive