Because nothing is voted on due to actual engagement, rather auto votes. So a meme no one cares about is not worth much.. and therefore autovotes ruin it. Now if it was a meme that started some amazing

Actually I’m not missing the point, I am showcasing why what many are discussing about the community spreading the word and the work I did are very different. I’m not downplaying the community’s role,

Nah.. I just tweeted and magic happened. There is a post to give information. Feel free to read it, or not. Have a good day.

Talks with binance started way before the launch 😃 perhaps it was just by magic though ... magic is magical like that.

Fair enough. Glory’s take is not true btw. Feel free to read my own post and comments about how it occurred and what was accomplished. I’m a lot of things.. but I’ve never had an issue with being honest

Perhaps read the actual proposal post.. as no it’s not for a month, and no those exchanges didn’t happen with “no negotiation”.. they took months of negotiations - Which I detail in the post...

Jfc.. people really are unintelligent and can’t read these day’s. I wish I lived in Glory’s head .. must be magical. Oh btw, if you hate Hive so much and love Steem... why are you posting here? 🤔

I mean when they discussed in Slack about having someone get payed 100$ a day for working with exchanges Justine thought that was too greedy and here shes asking for 500$ dollars a day. Maybe I should

The first CoinDesk article happened after the initial soft fork, before any "massive community tweeting" took place. So I understand your concern and am not taking away from community involvement,

I have some same thoughts about the ninja mine and hope we have a discussion about it soon. Just important to note my proposal, if funded at all, doesn’t come from the ninja mine. As you mentioned, the

No, all good. Sorry if my response was a bit rambling. I respect and encourage questioning all proposals.. just the insults and accusations seemed a bit unneeded. Anyways, thanks for listening to me ramble

*4 mths. 2 and a half past months of work plus 2 future months. Which included major exchange listings valued quite high and continued work to get more. If someone can do it cheaper, great. It seems the

Ah yes I understand the frustration and was just responding as this post is about me and so was Midlets comment. I think our community is amazing and am no way trying to take away from that.

I don’t think that was what he was saying. The community is amazing, but actively tweeting and contributing to spreading the word is very different than what my work describes. That doesn’t take away from

I actually believe most of my work described and what took the most time was in exchange listings. The PR aspects were just to ensure the story didn’t get buried like projects JS had done this to before.

I agree with those points and think that would hace end a great point rather than accusing me of back door deals (which you did, in many places). And yes there is an incentive to improve the ecosystem

It’s interesting you bringing up downvotes, as you are downvoting comments here by core members validating my contributions. How is that different than what you are mentioning as a concern? As far as the

Fucking A you didnt Show me where. And no I didn’t go to anyone to see if they would support it. Those who were part of the core group were encouraged to eventually make a proposal. In the beginning I

I completely agree with that statement and would have somehow liked to showcase it more. But it’s not my place to do so. Some do not want their contributions known. I mentioned Gandalf and I was including

Perhaps you should then get up to date on what is actually occurring before making such broad statements. I have no ego. I made a proposal for my own contributions, no one else’s. Whether it’s approved