An open-ended question to @ned and @dan

joseph(75)
Published in
#steemit
Words
147
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
9y

Yesterday I noticed ned@ned downvoting officialfuzzy@officialfuzzy posts to zero.

I tried to find out what was the cause.

I found out that dan@dan started downvoting sweetsssj@sweetsssj posts about 15 days ago.

sweetsssj@sweetsssj stopped posting, so did officialfuzzy@officialfuzzy

So are these steemians pawns in some power struggle that we do not know about?

To both of you dan@dan and ned@ned , downvotes are not private they are public.

People are not pawns, they have feelings, and hopes.

You should not downvote people in that fashion using your power on the platform without giving the community a reason.

This is starting to look like guilt by association.

If that's not what it is, then give these people a decent answer.

Not only them, "We" want to know why are you playing " Judge, Jury and Executioner " ?

On a platform you guys claim to have made for libertarians.

An open-ended question to @ned and @dan | Ecency