01:19 PM - Discord
Roy asked why each of my videos is worth a thousand dollars. My videos are priceless. Others might say they are worth nothing. Therefore, a thousand dollars is an awfully low compromise between two perspectives. Roy asked which methods I used for valuations, evaluations, etc. However, imagine asking a mother the potential value of her daughter or son. By the way, this is not about money. I just want my videos. The money only serves as an attention grabber. It serves as click bait. I was paid $20/hour for teaching English in Vietnam. You cannot put a number on the value or priceless items. If a robber steals your mom's dead body, you do not ask the robber for some money. YouTube is a grave robber. Roy is blaming me. Roy, do you want that video of Into The Wild? Let the record show, the answer is no. Roy spends four years begging Oatmeal to do a video on Into The Wild. Now the question is whether or not Roy values that video Oatmeal did. The answer is no. Roy was begging me for so many years. Let the record show, Roy hates Oatmeal Videos. Ian asked, "why did Roy join Infocomms in 2019?" Roy: "Activism." But that is like saying Roy loves Oatmeal Videos. You would have to be there to know what Roy really was doing there. I was there and I do remember. That is why I talk about Roy so much. Experiences are good. However, memories fade away. Also, people die. Therefore, it should be recorded. Content can spread around the world to educate, entertain, encourage, equip, enlighten, relax, energize. Keep an eye on Oatmeal. This happened on Ozark. Good series. There was an FBI agent. He had to go undercover to keep an eye on a family. That is Roy. Roy tries to act like he knew me in person. I just want my videos. I have no friends. A friend would try to get my videos from YouTube. Roy wrote: "Infocomms 2018...people are pissed because Joey keeps posting his silly videos while ranting that Youtube is deleting him." I don't remember that. I'm not even sure if Roy was there in 2018. Roy wants me to rely on my poor memory. Roy values poor memory over videos. What's the point of experiencing life if you cannot remember it? The other day, Roy went to my Discord server to send me a link relating to how I can hide my YouTube channels. Roy claims to know me. But anybody who knows me would know I would never ever want to hide my videos, pictures, channels, articles, GIFs, websites, blogs, content, etc. Alex Jones said he killed Sandy. Oatmeal said kill me. Alex said it to make a point.

---

I said if YouTube is morally justified in suspending an Oatmeal channel, then they are being immoral in not suspending all of the remaining 40+ channels and thousands of remaining videos online, that is how the logic follows.

---

Roy might be saying YouTube was right to ban me over creative video titles for short one second videos. Out of the 10K+ videos, around a dozen had some silly titles with word like porn, sex, boobs. Oh no, Oatmeal is making YouTube not safe. Let's put Oatmeal in prison. The problem is that invisible line between what is spam and what is false. The problem is that invisible line between what is spam and what is not spam, and also between what is false and what is not false. If there are YouTube videos titled Covid Vaccines Are Safe & Effective, how is that not false? YouTube can remove videos without giving a channel a strike. YouTube did not have to give me strikes for harmless videos.

---

YouTube suspended my channel in October of 2022 over a video I uploaded in January of 2021 where I rant about random things for 8 minutes. I briefly mentioned Election Integrity.

---

YouTube will strike you and say don't do that again. YouTube removes an old video of mine and say don't do that again. After that and out of the blue, YouTube will then remove another old video and punish me. It is as YouTube is trying to imply I did the the bad thing, the wrong think, after they punished me the last time. But I did not. These are older videos. YouTube might be implying that I go through my thousands of videos to then remove manually when they could have easily removed them automatically for me. Roy, why would I make better content if YouTube is just going to take it all from me any time they want to over fake excuses?

---

Oatmeal: "YouTube ate my baby." Roy: "Well, your baby FUCKING SUCKS. So the argument is moot." Oatmeal: "YouTube MURDERED MY FUCKING BABY." Roy: "Well, you were a bad parent. Good thing we put that FUCKING BABY out of her misery." Let's kill babies while doing porn. Never mind Daddy Oatmeal. Let's MURDER FUCKING BABIES. WHILE DOING FUCKING PORN. BECAUSE FUCKING DADDY OATMEAL IS SO FUCKING BAD.

---

Therefore, the logic follows, when terrible legless dog parents neglects their children, the answer is simple. FUCKING ABORTION. NOT ADOPTION. FUCKING ABORTION.

---

03:19 PM
YOUTUBE WRONGFULLY TERMINATED MY JOEYARNOLD7 CHANNEL. PLEASE GO TO THIS LINK AND TELL THEM ABOUT IT.
https://support.google.com/accounts/contact/suspended

YOUTUBE EMAIL: [email protected]
CONTACT EMAIL: [email protected]
CHANNEL: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAwWgeG_Zs2a0WQ1jRuBZpg

---

I wrote one official article regarding being banned so far plus daily blog post. EZ, I don't know if it works if you do not submit to YouTube a link to my YouTube channel. That form had no spot to enter in a URL for the channel. Therefore, they might think you are talking about your own YouTube channel. Therefore, we may want to find better means to trying to contact Google. I submitted that form to Google about YouTube 15 times in 2022. They responded one time about a former channel some months ago saying they were going to keep that particular channel suspended. EZ, the differences between our approaches is this, I was taking a more logical approach while you're taking an emotional subjective slant approach. I would say both approaches are needed. It really comes down to the individual YouTube staff members who may be involved and how much of their decisions come from emotion or from intellectual wisdom. I wanted to try to tackle it from an objective perspective. However, perhaps some of the staff might be insane. Some of them might have blue hair. I have no idea. Yeah, EZ. Agreed. Roy just want to see Oatmeal crash to the ground. Well, I hope Roy has his popcorn out. I hope Roy happy after four years of hard work. Roy gets what he wanted. Oatmeal crashing. Burning. The legless dog widow orphan Oatmeal off that lonely dark cliff.

---

Most watched Oatmeal Tik-Tok Video, 8K views: You Say Oatmeal Cringe, Ok, Then I Say You Blocked.

---

05:40 PM - Discord
Roy might be more friend than foe. But what kind of friend applauds the death of his friend's 10,000 babies? How does that even make sense? Geraldy Jones 65, have you ever talked to Roy? How do you make those words bold? I usually don't respond directly to what Roy says. Instead, I say what I say in order to copy and paste it to my blog. Roy does not want to get my videos back. Roy says my videos are poop. Roy tried to help me delete my videos. Roy sent me a link in my Discord server on how to hide my YouTube channels. Roy said a video archive should not include every video. Are you talking about community guideline strikes or copyright strikes? I would say the two are different beasts, that they operate differently. I think I've heard rumors of private videos being flagged, reported, given strikes. I cannot confirm because I don't hide most of my videos. My JoeyArnold7 channel on YouTube had over 3,000 videos. I imagine it would take while to hide them all. I think I can hide about 50 videos at a time. Roy is anonymous. So, banning the accounts of anonymous figures has little impact. The person or people behind Roy could easily pin the Roy persona to evil people in order to get Oatmeal in trouble by association or otherwise. The people behind Roy could easily escape totally free. That is one of the reasons I usually don't talk directly to Roy. What is odd is Roy makes good Oatmeal memes. So, Roy at least appears to be not the enemy sometimes. Around 2005, I was thinking about making this Devil account on Xanga. I had my main blog on that website, Xanga.com. The idea was I was going to play Devil's advocate. I forget if I made that account or not. It was to be anonymous and disconnected from my other accounts. I was to run around commenting and posting like I was the Devil. https://Xanga.com.

---

YouTube probably get people upset about being banned all the time. YouTube might be justified in banning some channels. They could easily assume I'm just another one of those. So the challenge would be to prove otherwise. In disputing my YouTube ban, I've mentioned how I didn't get a third strike. Also, I got 3 emails within the same minute. Also, that 2021 video didn't question the 2021 U.S. Election. Also, my silly videos with random titles is not spam. These are some of the arguments I have in disputing the ban. There may be other points. But these might be the top points.

---

In my next article, I may try to mention some of these points. I may try to highlight a timeline of events leading up to my suspension off YouTube. I'm trying to make sure I have some of the better points. I think going through the strikes I would get is important. I think going through videos took down is good. I think talking about some of the appeals I have won leading to my videos being put back up is also critical to the debate. Why is this happening? Are evil people trying to take me down? I would doubt YouTube staff are conspiring to take me down because I'm too small. I only had 220 subscribers. Geraldy, the demented Flopper thinks I'm a Qtard. One theory would be my YouTube channel was automatically terminated off a technicality. Perhaps they didn't want people to know my 3rd strike came from a computer glitch. Perhaps not an exact error in the code. But regardless, it appears to me they wanted cover up the real reason or details to why and how I got banned. So, they put together a cover story as an excuse to why I got banned. The cover story looks canned and fake. I gave Geraldy a VHS title on Discord on Memes World.

---

When I say glitch, I mean more like a loop hole. YouTube removed my video on the 10th day of October. This was on day 14 of my 2nd strike. They said I was not given a third strike because it was within the first 14 days. My appeal occurred either during that same 14th day or after that. The rejection of my appeal came Sunday, the 16th of October. Depending on the YouTube code, the appeal rejection may have turned a non-strike video into a strike-video because it occurred outside of the first 14 days. Perhaps some of the staff wanted to either ban me or cover up for this glitch. Why me? You better ask YouTube. I think they should have told me not to appeal at that time. I want to hold them responsible for not letting me know about a potential glitch. From my perspective, it looks like YouTube is guilty of a bias, guilty of standing by while I accidentally fall off a cliff. I would win appeals which means YouTube would the videos back up. This would happen for months if not for years. I talk about in my blogs and in my videos. I won many appeals for months. I won so many appeals. No third strike. They sent me an email on the 10th of October of 2022 saying they did NOT give me a third strike. Flopper, do you work at YouTube?

---

@mwp#7258, EZ, I think I was banned off a glitch. In order to prove this THEORY, I would need to hack Google, get their computer codes, study the programming, and the discuss my findings with computer science experts from all around the world. Flopper, timeout? No. Flopper, where is my third strike?

---

In email and on Twitter, YouTube told me I was banned due to violating community guidelines or terms and services or policies. But the guidelines and the terms are not the same thing. The fact that the different responses and reasoning behind my banning is not consistent and the fact that they refuse to say I got a third strike is fishy. Cosmos. Mango. Save us. What Flopper said about the Pagoda is fake news. Flopper is probably flagging me. The plot thickens like a bowl of oatmeal. EZ, do you really think YouTube staff can be influenced and manipulated emotionally? Wait a minute, if Flopper doesn't watch my videos, then how the heck did he get into this Discord server? My concern would be how manipulated social media staff may be on an emotional level. It may be that many staff are more emotional than they are analytical. I find it odd to some extent because I always thought they would be more obliged to simply following company protocol regarding procedures relating to how channels are suspended. Let me tell you how I would see it. Close your eyes. I would imagine YouTube Staff number 345,987, Bob Roy. He receives an email from Oatmeal reading, "Why was I banned?" Roy would then look on his screen. The computer would pop up an automated and canned response. Bob would copy and paste the response into the email, it would read, "Cuz you broke the rules you freak." And then when Oatmeal and other people email YouTube, it would redirect to Bob who would respond, "I already told you why you were banned for the last time." So the challenge would be to get the staff to look past the automated responses which the AI gives them. Staff feel busy. Staff don't want to dig. Staff don't want to research cases, details. So, the trick would be in getting staff to do a deep dive investigation. That would lead to my channels being restored, the 10K+ videos including a video of singing for an hour or so long while walking through Saigon.

---

Looks like I cannot find some of my videos from 2019-2021. Been looking around on my computer for hours now. I do not want to accept that I wasn't backing up all of my videos at that time. Some of the videos were streamed to YouTube via Stream Yard. I was supposed to download them. I imagine I did sometimes perhaps. I'm still trying to figure it out.

---

---

---