11:06 AM - Discord
That CNN video above is FAKE. EZ Blazer of the Memes World Productions posted the video which relates to the second Alex Jones trial. It does not tell you the entire story. What do you disagree with Trump about?

---

Trump said women throw themselves at rich people. Famous people. These women will let you sleep with them so they can get some of that money. Gold Diggers. It's the entire grab them by the pussy quote. Trump did not say you SHOULD grab women by their pussy. Trump said you CAN because those women have no morality and they're just trying to use you. I would do exactly what Trump did in his life. I like Flopper over Roy. Flopper is direct. I was able to talk to Flopper directly for two hours in the voice chat. Do I have any black fans? Not that I can think of. I talked to Flopper about pop culture. I cannot find the video on YouTube.

---

Big Flopper said he is from South Africa and is on the left politically. Yeah, sounds like Flopper is hiding behind a voice changer. Jumanji, great movie. Yeah, the golden age feels like it was years ago to me. But it was like only a few months ago. I don't know how to get Roy. I've been trying to get Roy since 2019. It's possible that I would not record a conversation with Roy. What if Roy is fed? House phone as in a cell phone? Some FBI agents are good people. Perhaps most FBI agents want to only help. Roy is most likely just an old man.

---

I would not get in and run off in the Scooby Do Memes World Van. I am dedicated to finishing up this current chapter in the story and outline of my autobiography. I need more than Internet. I need all of these boxes of stuff. But I don't want to run around with my boxes.

---

I would love to process the boxes and then lock the boxes up under the Statue of Liberty in a secret vault and forget about them. Roy, are you fed? Do you think those guys in Vietnam were FBI agents? I made a video talking about how I saw a black car in Vietnam. I think it was a car. I think I only saw one car. But then again, I may have seen a few different things a few different times.

---

Roy thinks you can copyright protons flying through the air. Things can react to light. However, who owns the light? I believe in chemistry. How can you own what is not owned? If you take a photo of my face, if you own the paper, then how can I steal that paper that you own from you? Imagine I copyright my face. You take a photo of my face. So, I take you to court. I say, "Your honor, my face is copyrighted." "Your honor, I totally and absolutely patented my face." "Your honor, I trademarked my face." This is my problem with copyright in general. This entire skit we just rehashed here illustrates how I feel about it. Roy, will you call my house phone? We can get to know each other on a sexual level.

---

When a judge says don't take photos in the courtroom, if the judge owns the building, then it comes down to ownership rights and not copyright rules. I have not seen your hair. I've not posted nudes. Roy, how do I know you are not EZ? I say a nude is if you can actually see private parts. So a person wearing a towel is a nude? A person wearing body paint is nude? You are an old man. How old is Roy Merrick? My guess is either 75 or you are like 25. I imagine you are possibly younger than me. If not, then possibly a lot older. More likely you're older than me. My intuition whispers stuff to me. You react more to the old comments meaning the old triggers you. If you really do have a lot of boats, then you got a lot of money. I didn't say you were between 25 and 75. Roy has 2 boats and a canoe. He shares it with family. Sharing is caring says Winnie The Pooh.

---

Copyright is a crazy thing that goes back to like the 1500s if not earlier. But mostly the 1500s. If I take photo of you, do I have to blur out your face? If I take a photo of Britney Spears, do I have to blur out her face? If I take a photo of a five year old girl without first getting the consent of the parents or guardians, do I have to blur out the girl's face? Legally speaking, do you have to blur out people's faces in photos and videos?

---

I disagreed with Trump when Trump talked about Covid Vaccines, copyright, banning bump stocks for guns, and perhaps the idea that we have to have like a lot of federalized and centralized tyranny of cops and military (assuming that is what Trump was getting at).

---

Why would you not get consent from your own family? Doesn't that sound disrespectful?

---

I do not want to try too hard to copyright protons of light, uncountable water, invisible wind, unstoppable energy waves, electricity, radio waves. That is basically what the Internet is.

---

If EZ said earlier that Alex Jones was talking about Sandy Hook every day since 2012, that is false. The fake news is lying about what happened. Did I record his son? I do not believe in consent.

---

Imagine copyrighting thoughts. What is the difference between a camera and your eyes? A camera captures light. Your eyes captures light. Eyes copy the light. Cameras copy the light. Can I put a computer chip in your brain? Is that what Elon Musk told you?

---

Roy Merrick, what are your thoughts on TRANSHUMANISM? Does that mean you want to merge with machines? What is the difference between brain waves and computer waves? What is the difference between brain waves and data waves? What is the difference between brain waves and the movement of data in the form of electric current inside computers? Are you going to make distinctions? How are the two not apples to apples? What is the difference between frequencies? What is the difference between cats and lions? It appears the man did not have to hit that teen in that video. I would try to record it and take the teen to court. But going to court costs money and time. So, you could try to upload the video and hope that helps. I would not encourage people to hit back. Sure, the teen probably deserves some kind of form of justice. What is the difference between wolves and dogs? Dogs and wolves are dogs. Cats and lions are cats.

---

Different cat animals are cats. Different electrical frequencies are still inside the electrical family. When they copyright a movie, what part of the movie are they copyrighting?

---

If you put a movie on a DVD and copyright the DVD, then the DVD would be the physical entity that would embody the copyright. If we are talking about copyrighting DVDs, I get it. If we are talking copyrighting physical items, then I get it. If we are talking about literal video tapes, VHS cassettes inside VCR machine. If we are talking eight track tapes. If we are talking about audio tapes. If we are talking about records which are played in record players. Then I get it. When I say movie, I do not mean any of these things. I care about private property. When you copyright a movie, what part of the movie are you copyrighting? Can you copyright protons? Roy says yes. Why? You can copyright electrons? Roy Merrick said electrons.

---

Roy: "I saw a dystopian movie this weekend that you probably haven't seen yet...Things To Come (1933)." Roy, why are you always sending me things on Facebook? Roy says he does not do Facebook.

---

Can we copyright electrons? Roy replies saying I would have to be more specific. But why? Are electrons not electrons? Roy: "There is a distinct difference between a random electron or proton flying through space as opposed the when electrons (or protons) are used for human communication...at least for sake of your argument." Electrons are electrons. It is like saying a woman is not a woman. I believe women are women. I believe electrons are electrons. I am not racist towards electrons. I am not sexist towards electrons. What is the difference between ocean water and drinking water? Water is water. Electrons are electrons. Girls are girls.

---

What part of a movie is actually copyrighted? Duck did not say. It does not say. At what point is the copyright established. Are you going to make movie, put it on a single film and take that roll of tape to a copyright office to have that roll copyrighted? Roy Merrick, I said earlier that my concern is not tangible form. Roy, I wrote earlier, as seen above, what I was not talking about. I am not talking about tangible items. The second part is infused with the first part. If you want to copyright a video tape, that is fine with me. Are you trying to redefine tangible? You tell me what is on a movie film. But what is an image? What is a picture? Is it? Said who? A picture is tangible? Pictures are NOT tangible. In the process of creating a picture, what is PRINTED on paper is the personification and copy of that picture. A picture is NOT tangible. A picture is just captured light. Audio is captured audio waves. What you hang on the wall is merely a copy of the picture. Audio waves and light waves can only be copied so to speak, scientifically. Are you going to copyright the copies and not the original thing? If I take a photo of a copyrighted picture, did I then violate copyright? The problem with the Internet is everything is being copied. Think about who copies what online. I can give you a long list of how data is copied online. RAM copies data. Cache copies data. Hard drives copy data. Data centers copy data. Edward Snowden wrote a book about it. Are you calling Snowden an idiot?

---

Computer waves is same same like WATER. The problem with copyright is what if you are copying a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy...... of the original thing?

---

Roy Merrick, if I INDIRECTLY copy a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy....... of a copyrighted movie, did I then therefore violate copyright? A copy of a copy of a copy, etc. I have to say the word indirectly to make my point. To emphasize. Because you are at WAR with Edward Snowden. You have to look at the history of copyright. Copyright started off before the Internet. Look at the kings and people involved. If I copy a copy of a copyrighted movie, did I violate said copyright? If so, then your eyes are violating said copyright as well. Because your eyes are copying the data into your brain.

---

Brain Waves and Computer Waves are SAME SAME. There are people talking about putting computers inside our bodies. Roy Merrick wants to talk about the future. And yet, Roy does NOT want to talk about the future. I literally and DIRECTLY talk about what they do. What they say. What they are doing. There are so MANY BOOKS. So many documentaries. So many videos. So many articles. So many websites. So many PEOPLE. Who talk about it. They talk about what these people ARE DOING.

---

Roy Merrick said a few minutes, "LET'S FUCKING TALK ABOUT IT." But now Roy is like, "JUST KIDDING, FUCK YOU NIGGER." Roy wanted to talk about dystopian futures. It might be that Roy sees it as FICTIONAL. It seems that all of this is just a JOKE for Roy.

---

Roy said it is FICTIONAL. That is why I like Flopper over Roy. I like Ian over Roy. Flopper agreed with me. Flopper was direct with me. Flopper did not say what those stupid things were. I talked to Flopper about Severance and how Woke Leftists messed things up.

---

Roy, if a man ILLEGALLY uploads a COPYRIGHTED MOVIE to the INTERNET and I merely watch it, would you rather FIRST take me or that man to court? Roy Merrick, the problem is the inverse is happening. Did I say I made a copy? I said if I was WATCHING IT. Not COPYING IT. If you watch a YOUTUBE VIDEO, then DID YOU violate copyright for watching a YOUTUBE VIDEO? Edward Snowden is now officially a Russian citizen. Kathy Bike took me to that hostel. It is all connected. Discord says I am not here. If you look on my name, it is yellow. It was yellow. Roy is gone. And yet Roy is green. How does that work? How is Roy able to stay green and I can't? How does Roy do that? Are you guys in other Discord servers? Is that how you stay green and active?

---

If you watch a video on YouTube, did you VIOLATE COPYRIGHT? The judge said to Alex Jones to only say yes or no. Imagine the judge saying that to Roy Merrick. Roy is unable to respond to my question. Imagine watching a video on YouTube.

---

Roy Merrick might say he is giving me a taste of my own medicine to fight fire with fire as my cousin Nathan Williams would say when playing Mario 3 on the NES in the early 1990s before like 1993. Roy is Nathan. I like Flopper over Roy because Flopper is sincere. I cannot tell where Roy is coming from. I can have more respect for Black Lives Matter than I do for Roy. I have more respect for Hitler than I do for Roy. I have more respect for Satan than I do for Roy. Because even tho Hitler is evil, I know where Hitler is coming from. I understand his position. I understand his point of view. If Roy can rebuttal, that is fine. The problem is I don't think Roy can really counter what I say. Because deep inside Roy knows I'm right. I have home court advantage.

---

I asked Roy Merrick if he watched a copyrighted video on YouTube, if he thought that the act and action of him watching it would be then therefore him violating copyright. Roy Merrick was unable to respond to my inquiry on this matter. Instead, Roy resorted to insults and comedy. In other words, this is a funny game. I'm just a big joke to Roy. I however take all this very seriously. But Roy is currently trying to find a big bag of popcorn to splatter on my oatmeal.

---

I cannot move on until Roy Merrick responds.

---

08:05 PM
We're nearing my decadeversity of vietnamkathybikesexvirginity.

---

---

---