12:00 AM
Pino 1970 - COVIDLAND: Episode 2: THE MASK - This may be part two or three

---

12:27 AM
MASKS ARE CAUSING PERMANENT BRAIN DAMAGE PREVENTING CHILDREN FROM DEVELOPING INTO ADULTS.

MANY CHILDREN MASKS ARE FULL OF DEADLY CARBON DIOXIDE, GERMS, BLOOD, SNOT, LIQUIDS, BOOGERS. ONE KID HAD A MASK ON FOR 2 MONTHS 24/7, THEY HAD TO CUT IT OFF HIS FACE. THE BOY COULD NOT GET THE MASK OFF.

THIS GIRL. HER MASK WAS FULL OF VOMIT INSIDE. WORSE THAN OLD SOCKS ON YOUR FACE.

---

12:56 AM
THIS GIRL IS CRYING THAT SHE CANNOT BREATHE IN THE MASK, WE ARE TORTURING HER. WE ARE. YOU. ME. THAT IS RIGHT. EACH SECOND YOU DO NOTHING, YOU ARE AT FAULT. YOU SHOULD FEEL GUILTY. I DO. THAT IS WHY I SHARE THIS. BECAUSE I AM RESPONSIBLE. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE. IGNORING THIS MAKES EVERYTHING TEN TIMES WORSE. EITHER DO SOMETHING OR YOU MIGHT AS WELL TAKE HER DOWN INTO A BASEMENT TO DO GOD KNOWS WHAT YOURSELF. THAT IS WHAT WE ARE DOING EACH SECOND. RIGHT NOW, WE ARE HURTING HER.

---

12:59 AM
HE HUNG HIMSELF BECAUSE OF THE MASKS. HE WAS 14 YEARS OLD. EVERY TIME YOU WEAR A MASK EVEN FOR A SECOND, YOU ARE CAUSING KIDS TO LOSE HOPE. WHEN PEOPLE LOSE HOPE, THEY LOSE THE WILL TO LIVE.

---

01:06 AM
She took her life because you wear a mask. You are a murderer if you wear a mask because you make people feel depressed unto death, period.

---

01:08 AM
This girl committed suicide because you wear a mask. This shows you masks are killing people. THE MASS-MASK-GENOCIDE.

---

01:11 AM
She killed herself because you wear a stupid mask. Her name is Kennedy.

---

You are more likely to do evil when nobody can see your face, hiding behind masks for thousands of years.

---

01:21 AM
I posted a photo of a girl who ended her life on Facebook a few minutes ago. Facebook removed it and said that went against their rules.

---

How I Met Your Father 101: Pilot

2022-01-18 - Tuesday - 01:39 AM - 02:02 AM - How I Met Your Father 101: Pilot

---

Hilary Duff, Francia Raisa, Tom Ainsley. Hulu show. Narrator is in 2050. She lives in a smart house which is a bad idea if it takes over or if it is hacked or other problems. In the near future, Sophie (Duff) is telling her son the story of how she met his father: a story that catapults us back to the year 2021 where Sophie and her close-knit group of friends are in the midst of figuring out who they are, what they want out of life, and how to fall in love in the age of dating apps and limitless options. This first episode is interesting but probably not as epic as the original series, How I Met Your Mother.

---

How I Met Your Father 102: Beginning

2022-01-18 - Tuesday - 02:02 AM - 02:25 AM - How I Met Your Father 102: Beginning

---

She said you are afraid of porn. Hillary Duff said no, I'm afraid of government tracking me. That is true. But putting it in the show attempts to turn it into a joke. In loving memory Bob Saget who died of Covid Vaccines. This is my review of this series, this TV show. It is ok. It might be leftist woke garbage as most things are. It is average in some ways. Some people don't like it. Lesbian Asian counterpart of Barney is kind of cute but gay. That is gay.

---

The Witcher 107: Before a Fall

2022-01-18 - Tuesday - 02:53 AM - 03:38 AM - The Witcher 107: Before a Fall

---

City. Beat. Suspense in me. I like it. Mountain. Not dead. 12 years the Witcher waited. Now he calls for the law of surprise to take the girl. Good episode. Princess out in the woods, on the go, told to hide from the Witcher. She has powers. That other witch, Penelope Cruz, shows up in her old room. She talks to her former teacher. There is war which was interesting to watch.

---

11:32 AM
Gaming Historian - The Story of Mario Paint | Gaming Historian

Nintendo teamed up with MIT in around 1990 or maybe a year or so before that to develop educational games. Mario Paint came out in 1992.

---

On the 23rd of August of 1991, the Super Nintendo came out.

---

1993-09 - Edward Gussen filed a lawsuit against Nintendo of America and its parent company, Nintendo Co, stating Mario Paint,f or the Super Nintendo, which came out in 1992, infringed on his U.S. Patent, seven sheets long, number 4,782,335, filed on the 1st of November of 1988. His video game thing was called Video Art which was on sale for $89.99 which was or included a game controller device with two joysticks or buttons of some sort. Lin Ltd. It was an electronic system with one joystick. However, on the 6th of October of 1994, a federal judge dismissed Gussen's lawsuit because it was completely different. Associated Press, Weekend, October 15-16, 1994.

---

My response to this could drag on. I have a lot to say regarding legal issues. The judge was right and wrong in different ways. Copyright is a tricky issue. I talk about that at times regarding digital items as that could be used to infringe against mental thoughts which are ironically digital too. However, this case in point is mostly focused on actual tangible products. They're not solely digital. We're talking about hardware. However, I still have a lot to say regarding the foundation which copyright rests on which goes back at least 500 years or so to the beginning of the Printing Press era in the 1500s or so. I would say Mario Paint is similar to Gussen's thing. However at the same time, his thing is also similar to thing which came before him and their things are similar to things before them. This is where copyright and plagiarism becomes tricky. I would put more responsibility on the customers not to buy fake products, scams, products from companies who might be ripping off the products of others which you may see in places like China where they copy ideas they see from mostly places like America and they make a lot of money in places like China doing it.

---

So, long story short, I would raise awareness of scams, fakes, rip-offs, copies, plagiarism, etc. Let the crowd, the will of the people, the free market, decide not to support or buy or fund or promote them as opposed to relying too heavily, aggressively, etc, on judges to make companies and people pay or go to prison for breaking copyright laws and other laws. At the very least, have jurors decide the fate of some or all of those types of cases. Some of these issues and cases can rather become too subjective and a series of things. They also can be too much centralized power for judges to decide the fate of. These things can blur the lines or make it hard to draw the line and see the line between what is legal and not or moral or not or etc. In at least some cases, copyright and plagiarism can be interconnected or similar. Drawing the line between what might be copyrighted, patented, trademarked, etc, is insanely weird. For example, where do you draw line between which things are too similar to other things? Yoshi and Barney are both dinosaurs. Are they different enough from each other? Some movies and shows have the same name and yet are they infringing upon each other? Nicole Kidman was in a movie called The Others. So, can that be patented or copyrighted or what have you to prevent others from using them? I am just using that as an extreme example. Imagine how many songs are about love. Imagine copyrighting the word love. Imagine holding a patent for a game controller, a TV, shoe, hammer, or even the wheel. Are different tires unique from each other or are they all very similar to each other and where do you draw the line? If you think long and hard enough, you can come up with differences between identical twins and similarities between oranges and trains. So, my point is these things can be perhaps too subjective and rather a thing that the free market should sort out.

---

For example, if Nintendo felt like I stole their Mario video game and was selling it and was making it too much money and everything. If they felt like it was hurting their business, profits, reputation, brand, etc. I would argue, instead of taking me to court, they should take me to the court of public opinion and put out hit pieces on me if need be. Tell the world I was a scam or what have you and destroy my reputation with the general public as opposed to trying to lock me up in prison or heavily enslaved to fines. To the extent we can have better judges, jurors, laws, etc, or as good as possible, then we can somewhat rely on the judgments they make. But at the same time, absolute powers corrupt absolutely and things like copyright have been used by cartels and monopolies alike excessively over the centuries. In other words, copyright rarely helps out small struggling people. Same thing with taxes which corporations get around while the small fish or people become stuck with. Copyright has been too counterproductive and a number of things. That is why I talk so much about it over the years. I will continue to do so as much as I can as this is a big passion for me. Who draws the line between what is and is not different enough to be considered not infringing? Who draws the line? We also have Fair Use to consider. What is weird is if Nintendo encouraged people to copy their Mario Paint art onto VCRs because that could be consider a violation of copyright. Because it is a copy of the game. I would be against calling it a violation of copyright. But then again, I am against copyright as it is or it can be used as a blockade against free markets similar to taxes, regulations, etc.

---

This video features a man in a blond wig or perhaps that is his hair.

---

02:07 PM
I accidentally recorded over a movie I made (onto the VCR) with Mario Paint around 1999, an awards show. Characters went onto the stage to get awards. I forget the details. Something must have happened like a conflict or something at the end. I also a countdown thing I made for the 1999 or 2000s New Years. We must have got the game for Christmas of 1998 or something like that. But then again, I forget the exact year. But I believe I was doing art on Mario Paint either first or more often than when compared with MS Paint on computers.

---

02:12 PM
​@Alex Noa, stereotypes can sometimes be correct, but things are always changing, so stereotypes are more able to summarize the past to the extent it is first analyzed enough. The problem is individuals are always making choices which alters generalized stereotypes. However, the vaguer the stereotype, then the harder it is to alter it. For example, the stereotype that humans breathe air is one that is pretty hard to alter outside of including aliens, dead bodies, etc, in the statistics.
02:18 PM
Tim Cast - Timcast IRL - James O'Keefe, Andy Ngo, And Libby Emmons Join Discussing The State of Journalism

02:51 PM
Libby Emmons is wrong because Biden was installed and not elected, Trump won in 2020, and LETS GO BRANDON is an evolved version of MAGA that is more than mere FJB, it is more a movement designed to redpill people towards seeking freedoms, eternal principles, private property rights, other liberties, free markets, smaller governments, competition, free speech, etc, etc, etc, etc. LGB is so much bigger than what the fake news say it is. Libby is passing on fake news regarding Lets Go Brandon.

06:39 PM
Joe Rogan - Phillip Frankland Lee on the Grind of Working in a Kitchen

As a dishwasher, it was crazy.

If CirstenW was bad, what did she do that was bad? I don't know. I thought she did some good.

---

---

---