This wonderful weekend I will address the issues:
I will talk about my perspective and opinion, without this being something that should be imposed on any other view.
Each of these issues is complex and controversial, and there are arguments of all kinds.
Whether they are legitimate or illegitimate depends very much on factors such as ethics, morality, religion, culture, and law, and may vary according to individual perspectives and opinions.
The debate over whether the death penalty is legitimate or illegitimate is complex and is often based on ethical, moral, legal, and practical issues. Supporters of the death penalty argue that it is a just and necessary form of punishment for very serious crimes, such as serial murder, pedophilia, rape, or terrorism.
They also argue that it can be an effective deterrent to crime and can provide victims and their families with a sense of justice and closure.
However, opponents of the death penalty argue that it is inhumane, ineffective as a deterrent, and that innocent people are likely to be executed; the latter is shocking.
They also point out that the death penalty is often applied disproportionately to poor, ethnic, or racial minorities, and that application is inconsistent.
In short, if the cons could be overcome, it should be legitimate.
But how would we overcome the cons?
By practicing efficient justice, good judges, and better rulers, and eliminating the corrupt, the poor-minded who are racist or socially discriminatory.
The legitimacy of sex before marriage has also long been the subject of debate.
Proponents of sex before marriage argue that it is a natural and healthy expression of human sexuality and that it can be a way to get to know your partner better before marriage.
Furthermore, they assert that sexual morality should be a personal choice and that people should be free to make their own decisions in this area.
On the other hand, opponents of sex before marriage argue that it is immoral and goes against traditional religious and cultural teachings. They also argue that sex before marriage can increase the risk of sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies.
On the last part, I think those who disagree are wrong because sexually transmitted diseases still occur due to the presence of adultery in marriages and even unwanted pregnancies also occur.
Long live sex before marriage, but plenty of it!
The legitimacy of the pornography industry is another hotly debated issue. Supporters of the industry argue that it provides a form of artistic and sexual expression and that people have the right to consume and produce pornographic material if they wish.
They also argue that pornography can be used therapeutically for people with sexual health problems. I have friends, doctors, or therapists who recommend watching pornographic material to stimulate the creation of testosterone in men.
On the other hand, opponents argue that it is harmful to women and children and that it encourages human trafficking and sexual exploitation. They also argue that it can be addictive and can be used as a form of sexual violence.
Those who oppose it do not have a powerful argument, I say, because if there is a good education at home, nothing outside the home will affect them in a negative way.
There is nothing more wonderful than enjoying pornography with your partner; it motivates you to get out of the routine. Well, without exaggerating, because in pornography films, there are some positions that only a contortionist could do and if we think of practicing it we can have accidents like fracturing a penis and that must hurt a lot.
Original content is written exclusively for Weekend-Engagement writing topics: WEEK 149
[AI-free content]
I use CANVA to edit the images you see in my publications.
It is my responsibility to share with you that, as a Spanish speaker, I have had to resort to the Deepl translator to share my original content with you.
