I did read it, I will just make two comments, about offense defense weapons, OK so that is logical, would it not be more logical to not have either? Less dangerous too. So here the problem is human nature not actually governments.
The other is young people decided to take from the older guys, but when these older guys do retire do they not take from the younger via pensions etc?
Every view point has an opposite, for example government, is it good or bad? You want a smaller government I do too, but some don't want any government but would that work? Others actually like a huge government. It all depends on the benefits you think you can get from it, so again we come back to human nature. Sometimes I think it is even necessary to have a despot as ruler, as dumb as that sounds.
RE: Fascism Today?