Identity is not a statue that is unveiled one day or a name that is pronounced forever. We are a conversation between what we believe we are and what we are becoming. The question of identity accompanies us because it does not admit a definitive answer: each choice, each wound, each encounter leaves a mark and also opens a possibility. We think we know each other, but we often surprise ourselves by acting in ways we never imagined. That surprise does not deny identity; reveals that she is alive.
Saying “I am who I think I am” implies a certain fidelity to an image built with memories, values and stories. That image gives us cohesion: it allows us to say “I” and recognize ourselves before others. However, when it becomes rigid, it can become a prison. If we only accept what confirms our previous idea, we stop listening to the experience. Identity is defended, then, not with closed truths but with an open memory, capable of integrating what changes without completely erasing what came before. We believe we are, yes, but we are also what we do with what happens to us.
Saying “we are being” does not mean dissolving ourselves in every impulse. It means accepting that identity is temporal, relational and narrative. We become others: the gaze of others names us, corrects us, hurts us or sustains us. We also turn against others, when we discover our own limits and desires. And we become over time, because we are not the same as we are at twenty, forty or sixty. Continuity is not in repeating the same response but in assuming responsibility for our transformations. Being true to oneself is not about staying still, but about not betraying what we consider valuable while we learn to review it.
Perhaps the question is a false dilemma. We are not just who we think we are or just who we are; We are the tension between both things. Belief offers us a provisional center; becoming reminds us that that center moves. A mature person does not abandon his story, but he does not turn it into destiny either. Learn to say: this I have been, this I am, this I am becoming. In that formulation there is humility and freedom. Humility because we do not possess an ultimate truth about ourselves. Freedom because the future is not completely written and because we can always reinterpret what we have experienced.
Identity, then, is more like a work in progress than a finished portrait. It is written with small decisions and with big ruptures, with words that we repeat and with silences that change us. Sometimes we think we are loyal to ourselves and we are just repeating a comfortable character. Other times we believe we have lost ourselves and are going through a necessary transformation. Judgment about who we are takes time, and even then it is never completely final. That is why it is convenient to listen to ourselves without idolizing ourselves: to recognize what we already are, without denying what we have not yet been able to imagine.
Responding requires avoiding two extremes: identity as an immobile essence and as fluidity without memory. We are who we believe we are when we hold a narrative; we are when that narrative is corrected. One without the other becomes dogmatism or vertigo. Maybe the honest answer is: we are the question we keep asking ourselves. Between what is remembered and what is chosen, between what others see and what we discover, what we call identity takes shape. It is not a possessed response, but a task inhabited with lucidity and courage.
Photograph of my property taken with my Samsung Galaxy
Google Translate.