It's no secret that everything that is dilapidated has an excellent texture, an interesting combination of colors and graphics. Dilapidated housing, as a fact, is better documented at night - this way more atmospheric, lively and colorful pictures are obtained. And on a cloudy day, you can try to extract graphics from dilapidation.
The grays or browns of old woods combined with snow provide a nice contrast.
Yet in graphics, the main element is always the tree.
Adding branches or tree trunks to the frame makes the image a little more voluminous.
But, as I said, you still need to strive for versatility.
Using this genre of photography, you can create an interesting story about a house.
Even if you shoot the details of the house in close-up, it will still be graphics.
I have long thought about this method of capturing barracks and sheds, but I did not dare to try.
And having tried it, I now want to develop this topic.
Unlike other photographers who shoot something like this, I shoot dirty, that is, my subjects are chaotic and messy.
This could be my style if I perfect it.
But I still strive for the standard in this genre.
If I still somehow succeed in minimalism, then I have not yet fully learned the graphic cityscape.
I am also good at natural graphic plots, but with the city it is much more difficult.
Textures are generally the easiest to shoot!
To look for versatility in a chart, you need to train your eyes.
My myopia helps me to get out of focus.
If you defocus the gaze, then light and color spots, geometry will be available for vision.
The volume in the photo with graphics is an interesting thing: it seems that versatility is needed, but at the same time, for the graphic effect, you need to avoid explicit volume.
It is necessary that all plans merge into one single canvas.
But plans are needed. When they are not there, it is immediately visible.
In short, you need your brain to strain a little when viewing a picture.
To be continued...
