Hi again, thank you. I will refer to the subject of 'governing'. Maybe I will find my time to also include what else you said, not sure. i believe in non-coercion thoroughly. which is why i reject government

Ah, thanks for the story from your childhood, I couldn't really make the connection. HaHa! A good story, very much to the point! Everything you say is true about the Merkel men and the parallels that now

I respectfully disagree. Before Christianity, and even within the large cities or empires that already existed at that time, there were no official ten commandments. Which are for everyone to understand.

Hello to you, I have the impression that people want to be governed and that they are quite prepared to accept a government that uses its power to suppress and, if necessary, imprison those among its own

The term ‘Schildbürgerstreich’ is used colloquially to describe ludicrous and misleading regulations or excesses of bureaucracy. One example from abroad: The Chinese once decided to become the world's

I think we're being lied to mercilessly and that a great many people, perhaps most, agree with us, differing in details of course. Thank you, I appreciate your ability to find always a decent tone in person,

I already admitted that I know that there is no exact point in time where things shift from central- to decentralization. When hyperinflation begins, you have to be already self-sustainable, or else. For

There isn't a switch that flips and everything suddenly becomes completely 100% decentralized and all centralized production ends. :D HaHa! That made me laugh, since I guess that you know that I know that.

Hi, I was not referring to the prehistory of mankind. We don't know prehistory because we have no records. We have architectural artefacts, for example, and our interpretations of them, the oldest ‘records’

If attending school is associated with a high risk of terrorism, is that what the document asks you to sign? - you would theoretically not need to send your child to school. Strange thing. ... When I first

The fact is, it has come to this. If you are taken in by the forces that are playing out above your head and you have to decide who should rule you in a martial way, because it will always be someone,

Hello to you, No problem, the comment section is patient and we need not to hurry. We never know how our positive impact on just one person may shape and effect the lives of many others. Inculcating principles

Hello to you, yeah, once in a while I check up on you, but not too often, in order to not make it so intense. You said: While I get your point on having a clear answer in Aye or Nay, on the basis of ground

Falls es dich interessiert: Ich habe mit einer Freundin gesprochen, die sagte, sie hätte Angst vor einem dominierenden Konservatismus, als wäre konservativ sein etwas, was unsere Gesellschaft dominiert

A society in general relies on the criminal records of the people, but does not put certainty in what someone says he "believes" in. What you say you believe is not worth anything, if it is not

This is going to be a long response. The questions like these can never have a clear answer in Aye or Nay. I object, they can have a clear answer. When you go back to the very principles. One principle

Through freedom of thought. Though it might be reduced to you and you only, if you have not taken precautions to connect and bind yourself to a man or a woman, to your parents and your children and like

Nationalism is the last bastion for people who feel that they belong to their country, their language and their culture. Borders are essential for a nation. The border runs where the languages differ.

Regardless of who you want to ‘win’, it is important to be realistic. Ultimately, everyone decides on the basis of their own perception who they trust to be more professional in warfare. Which heads of

Those who took them and are alive, have no words to utter. I just yesterday spoke to a distant friend of mine, whom I told that I lost my job, through being fired to not have me - not once - been tested