Ah, thanks for the story from your childhood, I couldn't really make the connection. HaHa! A good story, very much to the point!

Everything you say is true about the Merkel men and the parallels that now exist in both our countries. Nothing good comes out of such actionism, which is completely unsuitable as a problem solver. The upside-down views are so obvious, so unmistakable, that it is hard to believe that one half of the people in the country seems to be completely struck with stupidity when they willingly saw up the branch they are sitting on. ... There seems to be a deeper desire for death behind this. I can't explain it any other way. In Germany, this is called the ‘unbearable lightness of being’.

The West, indoctrinated by a deep sense of guilt, does not seem to have realised that forgiveness of guilt is not a human act, but a divine act of turning to one's conscience.

The idea that today's blacks have to forgive today's whites and that the latter now have to collectively and submissively dispose of their order to have this act of revenge carried out on them is pure presumption and an overestimation of the possibilities of this idea. Rather, this is an expression of complete indiscipline as well as intellectual inertia and physical laziness. Nowhere in the Christian West is there any talk of anyone having a 'right' to take revenge. The reverse is true: someone who, out of pride/vanity, greed or wrath - to name just a few of the deadly sins - makes another the object of their sin is a rule breaker.

But since the devil is a great trickster, he twists the matter and turns the exception into a right and the right into an affront.

So the confused scream ‘I have a right to live myself out!’, meaning the lust to have sex with anyone and anywhere, just like getting wasted on drugs, ‘right to self-determination’ includes killing the unborn, and ‘right to work’, where women make themselves servants of the company or the state instead of living in union with their husbands and serve them, since that is the deal between the male and the female, that she is protected by him and being given material stability. While she gives him children and manages the social and household stuff.

The above named are not rights, never have been, but exceptions to the rules granted only under difficult circumstances, having a price tag. So that the norm was secured.

Your story reminded me on the male-female relationship - that grasshopper represents the crier for 'my rights!', while the ants represent disciplined working folks.

It seems I am prone to either too little text, or too much, in my replies.

Chuckle :D