The Woodstock brand, in its 50th anniversary year, finds itself needing an argument on its origins that it as an enterprise shouldn't need for a context. This half century of technological progress has brought us to blockchain simply because this is questioned now. If gene research can place roots on the tree of our species and that makes our origins unquestionable, why not do that for authenticating the origins of thoughts?
I've paralleled my art to this 50 year retrospective of what has led us to this point. Its Woodstock'94 narrative's invention of objects designed to be rare in their individually identifiable character made into a homage to this in http://www.greatknot.com/2.html that addresses this lost relationship to entrepreneurship and risk dealt to Woodstock by it forgetting its origins.
Posts like this are expected to be picked up as conceptual arguments on Woodstock'94 tags being what really promotes the closest link, now, to what that brand means. In light of everything just getting a start as a new enterprise today, in this year of that anniversary, this approach is the only statement to truly document its ideals.
Each time one of these 150 different objects gives its statement of origin: its creation date and the number of it that were made; it puts the Woodstock brand in the context of a meme that fits it to the blockchain. When there are 55,000 statements of that on https://www.facebook.com/greatknot, this will be how Woodstock is associated with enterprise in times to come. Watch.
Read next
From @cryptoknot