Manual curation overview (What Does “Great Content” Mean, Anyway?)
Hi!
Before the fork, the update has done everyone happy and unhappy why? happy with the new way of newsteem ecosystem and all the Whales, Dolphins, Bid Bots they are doing manual curation to rewards the good curators content. We know everyone is happy with the new steem ecosystem #newsteem. Unhappy because after the HF21 there are more challenges to face especially we are now facing the downvote wars I know most of us don't like downvote.
Manual curation overview
Manual curation is the next generation of the steem blockchain ecosystem. A project is when an individual manually curation features on the #newsteem ecosystem, which is often computationally predicted after the Hard Fork 21. Both the structure of the #old steem & #newsteem predicted feature can be added, as well as the new function of the newsteem feature. The new feature metadata in newsteem ecosystem is more and more highly valued. When It comes to manual curation we know that there are Whales, Dolphins, Orcas, are doing manual curations namely; 
Image Source
NO TO BID BOT! YES TO HUMAN VOTE!
Why manually curate?
Manual curation is a critical step in assessing and improving the new generation of newsteem ecosystem. Because of all the whales, dolphins, Orcas prediction accuracy to vote manual and take more time to read every article's post every now and then. Additionally, manual curation is the next generation to step forward to the next level. Communities experts significantly enhance the value of each post to help the small accounts to grow.
Image Source
What Does “Great Content” Mean, Anyway?
Many of us spend more time to make great content. Most of us write to earn the benefits of great content. But how many people practitioners to read every post to stop to consideration votes, What I mean is most of the users are dwelling votes and not reading the articles. Are you agree with that? Yes, Because most people have made different contents like Photography, blogs, writings, memes, contests, and many more.
Is it great because every author thinks so? Or because they know every content counts and rewarded and shared thousand of users. Was it great because Witnesses there was manual curation content after the Hard Fork21 Those are all things most feel satisfaction because of all of the great content they created and published?
The lost opportunity is that most content that we aspire to be created, us followers following subjective to interpretations designed to achieve the outcomes earnings. “Let’s create the new steem Manual Curation”, or “Let’s build #newsteem ecosystem to the next generation”.
As a blogger or trying to be a writer haha. “great content” is the best practice to defined by me, you or everyone. It is defined by the users to make great content that is intended for prospects to the manual curation team, users & influencers. By the curation team trying to attract, engage and influence the curator's content.
Does not all content need to be Manual Curated? Yes, of course, because many of us simply don’t know what we want or likes. There are many opportunities to produce great content to support defining a new steem ecosystem and most category, concept or way of thinking, writings, blogs.
I should mention part of the Manual Curation Team Inspiration I read yesterday
https://busy.org/@minnowsupport/minnow-support-is-switching-to-manual-curation
Thank you
Image credit 