At Most, a Footnote

Words
1094
Reading
5 min
Listen
Play
10h

There are moments when the ordinary routines of life suddenly seem strange to me. People wake up, shower, get dressed, shave, cut their hair, worry about how they look, go to work, buy food, answer messages, make plans, build businesses, raise children, argue with strangers, fall in love, get bored, and do it all again the next day. Someone sells fish on a beach. Someone else spends years creating an application that allows a complete stranger, at 2:37 in the morning, to have a conversation with a machine that has learned from decades of work on language and computing. None of this feels particularly philosophical while it is happening. It is simply life. Yet sometimes I stop and think about how temporary all of it is. Not in some mystical sense, and certainly not because I think there is a hidden meaning waiting for us if we look hard enough. The basic fact is much simpler. At some point, every person who is doing all these things will stop doing them. The clothes will remain somewhere. The apartment will belong to someone else. The phone will eventually be replaced. The photographs will become old. The conversations will become memories for other people. And then those people will eventually disappear too.

That is probably where my discomfort with nihilism begins. I do not find the idea of death particularly original, and I am not pretending to have discovered some terrible secret about existence. What bothers me is something more concrete: what actually remains when a person is gone? A few people become historically important. Their names survive for centuries, sometimes for thousands of years. Cleopatra is still known almost everywhere, although most people could not name ten verified political achievements from her life. Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, George Washington, Joan of Arc, Aristotle, and countless others survived partly because their lives became part of history, education, politics, literature, or popular culture. But even that kind of survival has limits. What survives is not the person. It is information about the person, interpretations of the person, stories about the person, and whatever influence their actions happened to have. Most human beings do not receive even that. For most of us, the people who remember us will eventually die too. A generation disappears, then another one, and eventually there may be nobody left who remembers our voice, our habits, our temper, our jokes, or the things that made us recognizable to the people around us. At most, perhaps, we become a footnote. And most of us do not even get that.

I have been thinking about this more because I am watching someone die. My uncle has cancer, and his condition has become impossible to ignore. He has lost an enormous amount of weight, sleeps very little, lives with constant pain, and medication does not seem to give him much relief. I do not want to turn him into a saint because he is dying. I never particularly liked him, even when he was healthy. He could be arrogant, spoiled, impulsive, angry, and remarkably insensitive. I have no interest in rewriting his personality now simply because his life is ending. At the same time, watching another human being reach that point changes the way death looks. It is one thing to understand intellectually that a person will eventually die. It is something else to see someone becoming weaker in front of you and to know that the process will not reverse. There is no argument to make against it. There is no clever observation that changes anything. There is simply the recognition that the end is approaching, whether the person is admirable, unpleasant, loved, difficult, generous, selfish, or some complicated combination of all of those things. That scares me more than the abstract idea of death ever did.

What makes it even harder is seeing how complicated the aftermath can be. My uncle has children, and their reactions to what is happening are not what I might have expected. One of them can sit at a computer while all of this is happening. Another knows what condition his father is in but has not done much about it. I cannot pretend to know everything that exists between them, and I do not want to judge a relationship I have not lived. Perhaps some of this distance has something to do with the kind of father he was. Perhaps people respond to the end of a relationship according to everything that happened before the end. My grandmother is ninety-eight and still alive, lucid, and strong, while my mother may soon lose one of her children, and that contrast is difficult to process. Families carry decades of affection, resentment, habits, disappointments, obligations, and memories into a moment like this. None of those things disappear simply because someone is dying. In the end, however, the same question remains. After the arguments, after the mistakes, after the achievements, after the money, after the photographs and stories, what is actually left?

I do not have an answer, and I am not sure there is one that would satisfy me. Maybe there is something valuable in simply acknowledging that there is no guarantee that a life will leave a permanent record. Maybe the desire to leave something behind is another ordinary human impulse, like wanting to be loved or wanting to be remembered. I understand it, but I cannot convince myself that becoming historically significant would solve the problem. Cleopatra is remembered, but Cleopatra is still dead. Caesar is remembered, but Caesar is still dead. The names survived. The people did not. That does not make their lives meaningless, but it does make permanence a very different thing from significance. Perhaps that is what has been bothering me. I am not afraid that my own name will disappear from history because it almost certainly will, and there is nothing tragic about being ordinary. What hurts is knowing that the specific people who exist now, with all their contradictions and imperfections, will eventually become something that can no longer be experienced directly. My grandmother will not always be here. My mother will not always be here. My uncle will not always be here. Neither will I. There may be no conclusion to draw from that. Maybe there does not need to be one. For now, I can only look at the situation honestly and admit that, when everything is finished, the most any of us may leave behind is a footnote.

This words on this post are a personal need that I had.

At Most, a Footnote | Ecency