There are so many pieces in "Modern Materialistic Science" that is, like, the opposite answer.
From a philosophical point of view, can you know the river? The river today is not the river that was there yesterday. All the water has changed, but it still looks very similar. But, here, we chose to accept that the river is fixed, static, knowable. And discarded the ever changing, elastic, only sorta knowable.
"Modern Materialistic Science" didn't want to deal with God, so they separated physics from metaphysics. And from that point forward, only looked at half of the world. And a view where God HAD TO BE written out.
The modern teacher tries to teach science dispassionately. A thing in language, is we say that "something likes to do this", but modern science wants to say that "atoms do not have likes, the are inanimate and just obey laws"… and this leads to the universe just being a clock that is running down. However, if you talk to people (yogis, mystics) who have connected with the everything, they will say that every single thing has consciousness. The atoms love doing atom stuff. And they really have preferences.
So, really, the fight of the century will be between scientists who believe the universe is dead, and those who believe it is alive.
Water has memory.
And water is affected by emotions, thoughts, focus.
Masaru Emoto did many experiments with water and the crystals they form. Water that didn't form these beautiful crystals, was exposed to written words, like "love", and then after formed the crystals you see above. And, you could melt the crystals, and they would reform much the same. (but not identical)
And that is too esoteric, and not enough strict science, what about boiling water?
Boiled water boils easier that it did the first time. No, really. If you turn water into steam, and back into water, the next time it takes less energy to turn that same water into steam. Less energy. Like, completely dismissing the laws of thermodynamics.
Or, another one that all chemists know. Getting a certain solution to crystallize is hard. However, after that first time, it becomes easier to get that solution to crystallize. Even in laboratories thousands of miles away. Its like the atoms have discovered this new way of arranging, and now, all the atoms want to try it too.
Atoms are atoms, right? Well, it doesn't appear to be.
This is one of those weird things. And it has been captured in data from many tests.
Such as, the subjects is asked to think of a certain number, as they roll a bunch of dice. And people have an effect on the dice. Some people a lot of effect. Way more than random chance could account for.
Scientists have conclusively found that people can affect the outcome of what is supposedly purely random. And, "Modern Materialistic Science" just discards this entire genre of experiments. They don't teach anything about it, they don't say anything about it. The new science student has to happen upon the information.
How could colleges and universities just ignore something so important? Well, it discards the notion that this universe is just random. And that destroys the narrative of "Modern Materialistic Science"
Here is where "Modern Materialistic Science" runs smack into its limitations.
If it isn't visible, measurable, consistent, it doesn't exist. And so, things like ghosts, phantoms, elves, evil spirits do not exist, by definition. "And God doesn't exist. Besides, he was put on the other side, constrained to metaphysics, which isn't science at all…" say the modern physicists.
The problem with this is that life, the universe, science is a continuum from the very physical to the very spiritual. And so, in order to comprehend our world, we need physics and metaphysics back together under the same roof.
There are countless stories of NDEs (near death experiences), as in, one nurse has put together books filled with stories of people who would send them to her. And these books are the good ones, the interesting ones, not all of the stories that she got. And there are many, many experiences that were never written down, or never found their way to her.
And what does "Modern Materialistic Science" say to this? It is all a hallucination. It isn't real. Even when to the people who experienced the NDE, it was the single most profound thing to happen in their lives. But, the scientists say, its rubish. It was not a controlled experiment in a lab, and so they don't count. And, we have no way of knowing if the person is telling the truth, or it was a drug filled hallucination.
How do these scientists get away with ignoring so much data? Seriously. But, "Modern Materialistic Science" have everyone believing that it isn't real. And, of course they would, because they can't allow God to come into the equation.
This will be the biggest thing, the biggest change in science in the future. Will be ways of putting together accounts of different results across experiments. Researchers will have to write down their emotional state, as well as the readings they have gotten. We will realize that we are in a much bigger world than we would admit, and this world responds to us, our emotions and our expectations.
There is just too much evidence that the materialistic point of view is completely false.
We will move from a materialistic point of view to an ontological point of view in our science.
The science is not settled, in fact, it is completely wrong.
And, when we turn away from this dead end, we will discover more in the next ten years than we did in the last hundred.
Exciting times ahead for scientists and inventors.
