If it wasn't clear enough, the statement I was making was that I thought your comment was overrewarded and didn't deserve to be at the top of the post in front of more interesting commentary. As for the

The pump during the early days was due in large part to all the press associated with the stake fight and ultimately the fork away from the steemit-controlled Steem blockchain.

This is probably what you're looking for:

The interstellar video gave me a flashback to when I spun the mad hatter teacups at Disney world too fast as a little kid (for one of the kid-friendly rides, it was amazing how much of a headache it could

That's a neat point about the photography, I never thought much about how filtered reality is for travel photography, although it's obvious after you pointed it out.

Moving your comment from the top to the bottom isn't hiding it.

It's a general solution to a general problem as opposed to manually modifying the front ends for a one time solution to a specific issue. And from an implementation point of view, it's also less work,

So you actually thought your (primarily self-voted) comment that was mostly just an opinion without much real content was worth $3 USD? That's pretty funny :-). Anyways, it's like you don't understand

It's already been discussed and I created an issue for it last night.

I wrote this last night: But I still doubt it's the issue.

The powered down Hive gets sent to DHF, where it gets converted to HBD, which can then be used to further power the stabilizer (or other DHF proposals). With the incredible ROI of the stabilizer right

One man's garbage is another man's view of ridiculously high profits for the coin. I'm not even super-invested in driving up the price of the coin right now, but an advertisement for an ROI this high is

Regarding your point about DHF funding, my original specification for the algorithm didn't divide "new money" by 100 for the daily budget, only "old money" already there. So it would

Please don't misunderstand, I'm not offended. I just disagree with you on the economics. The returns being generated in this case are "optics-positive" for investors interested in profits, IMO.

Yes, I'm sure. You can do it with a spreadsheet too. The only issue, as I mentioned in other comments, is that the final implementation for DHF imposes the 100 divider on the new money (the profit) as

Read my other comments. If they are not clear, feel free to comment and I'll explain further.

Btw, if you want to see what kind of compounding we would have had if we didn't have the 100 day divider on new money as well as old money in the DHF (ie. my original spec for the DHF), go to this page,

It will blow them away with the compounding. Unfortunately, because the daily DHF budget limiting wasn't designed exactly to my original specification, it divides new money added to the budget by 100,

By the way, just for amusement value, do a web search, plug in a daily interest rate of 30% and a daily compounding rate and look at the crazy APR that would generate for Hive holders if HBD could resist

It's becoming obvious to me that many people don't really understand the percentage profits made by the stabilizer posts and the stabilizer proposals, or I guess there wouldn't be complaints. Here's the